fedezan76

DeRank : 9,44
DeAge™ : 6282 days • Here since 28 march 2009
Manowar Fighting The World
Voto:
This time no one can take the one away from you. Yes, because it's too obvious here that you're a fake! There are parts where your Italian is perfect. And you even have some spirit (which true metallers lack): the songs that last 6:01 and 1:18.
Rainbow Rising
Rainbow Rising
15 jan 10
Voto:
In fact, it’s not the first album, which is called "Ritchie Blackmore's Rainbow" (oh, our dear’s grandiose delusions ...) and it's a really good record. But "Rising" is indeed their masterpiece, a splendid album, followed by an excellent "Long Live Rock 'n' Roll." After that, without Dio, they lose a bit. Not that they’ve become non-believers :)
Uriah Heep Return To Fantasy
Voto:
Well, yes, and then I have a soft spot for Heep. I've been listening to them for ages...
Rage End Of All Days
Voto:
I almost forgot, a "true metallers" doesn’t say please (not even all together)!
Uriah Heep Return To Fantasy
Voto:
Congratulations on the review. The album is nice, but it’s not among my favorites by Uriah Heep. The albums with Byron are all very beautiful. I put Salisbury above all others. But I also quite like the mentioned "Firefly" with Lawton on vocals and the much-criticized "Conquest" with the splendid and original Sloman. Anyway, the Heep have done something good even afterwards ("Abominog," "Sea of Light").
Tommy Bolin & Friends Live At Ebbets Field '74
Voto:
Great review. I don't have this live album, but I love Bolin's guitar style. Starting from the James Gang, moving on to Spectrum (which I personally don’t like as an album) and up to his solo works. It's a shame he left us so young.
Rage End Of All Days
Voto:
Great creative, your reviews have become like a drug for us!!!
Syd Barrett The Madcap Laughs
Voto:
Nice review. I don't know the album, but the first album by Pink Floyd was brilliant!
Glenn Hughes Burning Japan Live
Voto:
@superboia: I completely agree regarding the appreciation for this immense artist. As for the review, I accept your criticism but I don’t share your opinion. I have a precise idea of how a review should be written, and if you notice, mine follow more or less the same model. First of all, because I have to consider that the reader may not be familiar with the product or the artist. For this reason, some digressions about the history of both are useful to provide context and possible ideas for future listening. I don’t feel I have gone on longer than necessary. There is a logical thread. I also try, as much as possible, to describe the type of music presented. I don’t particularly like it, but sometimes it’s necessary to make a few comparisons to convey the idea. This is not the case with this record.
@jargon: I understand, well tastes are tastes. We all have our preferences.
Stevie Ray Vaughan and Double Trouble The Essential
Voto:
The review isn’t bad, but I agree that it’s pointless to list tracks if you don’t at least describe them a little bit.