alia76

great motivation. that's how it's done! I completely agree on the "derivation." anyway, it remains a 3/5 for me. p.s. Editors: are the samples always on delay? why is that?

mmh, indeed I was expecting the whirlwind of "votes for the hot ones" but... well, she's not beautiful, but she has that red that ignites, right? come on, CPTGAio, this album is not a 2 out of 5. at least it's more listenable than Strange little girls (a bit of a wicked joke that you’ll understand since we love Amos regardless). anyway, please give me your reasoning.

Dear Gurzogurzo, I quote from your presentation: "My goal is the author's mistake: it's easy to write one of many reviews with simple errors such as missing double letters in the same word, while it's more difficult to write some of the reviews that even might have a meaning, written all like this sentence, which seems to have a meaning but in fact, it doesn't have one. I hope I’ve been understood."
Don't think that your intention is so simple! Navigating around mistakes and making them seem unintentional when they are, requires mastery of a certain linguistic culture. In this sense, a phrase like "the spark that makes the VASO overflow (and not the drop)" would have been more effective. In any case, I wish you all the best.

I think that if this album had been called "the toilet," it would have gotten more praise. At the very least, it would have been a title quite fitting.

two of the most unbearable characters (IN MY OPINION) put together to give birth to this rubbish. p.s. I respect Bennato (especially I feel sorry for the misfortunes of his private life) even though I don't know his musical past very well, his present and recent past are enough for me to struggle to digest him.

Is it my turn? I was really waiting for a second review of this album so I could say that, unfortunately, Antony no longer overwhelms me. I have the impression that with the first two albums he said everything he had to say, and that, once the surprise effect and the enthusiasm of the first listens have faded, this album is worthy but nothing more. For this reason, I find this review excessively enthusiastic while the album earns its fair share of shelf dust.

@STONEY: I feel obliged to disagree in this specific case. It is true that the pussy clouds the minds of those who don't want to listen deeply to what a young lady proposes. However, in this specific instance, I want to emphasize that when Bextor made her mark with Groovejet, she was exclusively a voice in the middle of a nightclub. A voice that wasn't exceptional but was still unique. Then the character (the figure) emerged later. Even in Spiller's video, Sophie was predominantly shown in close-up. It's true that they wanted to play that up when launching her as a solo artist. However, I wouldn't compare Bextor's approach to that of American pop stars. Even Minogue, while flaunting her curves, appears refined and not in bad taste. In short, I see more balance in these cases. As for the "refinement" of certain music, I can tell you that in the genre, Bextor is quite refined. It depends on what you mean by refined. Of course, if you think of Sade, for example... we're really far apart. Cheers to everyone!

@PANAPP: alright, go ahead with the discography. But please, change your approach or focus on other aspects otherwise the picture of the review will appear, since you will be writing it, always the same. (of course, this is just my suggestion)

@ZARATHUSTRA: you really couldn't avoid mentioning Jurman, who gets on my nerves big time not least because he acts so smug but in the end, at forty years old, he still hasn't accomplished a damn thing??! (but the dye on his little mustache looks great on him!)

indeed it's true... there are no reviews. is that possible? well, anyway, congratulations and welcome. I don't know him well. I imagine you wanted to give the max, not 3 stars.