Don_Pollo

"having lost my wallet; definitely in the venue, most likely during the first mosh pit." That's why at heavy concerts I leave my wallet in the car and only take cash with me. :D Anyway, I've had these marked since the extinction of the plesiosaurs but I haven't listened to them yet, I will remedy that.

It's been two years since I abandoned this music, which is why every time I read these names I think: "...Oh, are they still alive?"

Chilosà, maybe they found Jesus.

Ah, are they still alive?

Today is a day to remember. I've managed to make it to the end of the album. Well, not quite yet, I'm at the penultimate song, but at this point, I plan to succeed. It's not a bad album, no, the main problem is the monotony. Boredom, boredom, boredom! Reaching the end is difficult, as evidenced by the fact that I only did it today, six months after the first listen. The other times I would make it to track 10 and stop. Average with the previous score.

Anyway, it's worth mentioning that the guys on the cover are very sexy, especially the chubby one.

But what are you saying? This is definitely the best album of the decade. And to avoid talking nonsense, I’ll go and look it up. Instead.

I can't rate the review, but I'll pass because the album has really worn on me. I can't listen to it in full anymore; in fact, I can't even listen to the individual songs, Codex aside.

First review, so I’ll make a serious comment. Starting with the number of tracks: when I read there were only 8, I expected them to be 7-8 minutes long each, and instead it lasts not even 40 minutes. It definitely benefits from being more digestible. That said, at first the album only made sense in the last tracks (Codex is, for me, the masterpiece of the record; the other two, especially Separator, are still excellent), but now I’ve also come to appreciate the first part. The first two pieces remind me of Can, while Feral is very Four Tet-esque. The only one I have some doubts about is Lotus Flower. Overall, a nice album, better than In Rainbows in my opinion, but I wouldn’t call it a miracle. 4 for excess (in tenths it would be a 7.5). The review isn’t bad, but I’ve never been able to stand track-by-track breakdowns, sorry. :D

If a book were judged by its cover... :D