Stephen King It
Stephen King It
27 nov 08
Voto:
And in any case, Sergio Leone is now universally recognized as the great director he is, while you can be sure that Stephen King will be regarded for what he is: a minor writer with global success. Exactly like Follett, Smith, Brown, and all this crowd of scribblers.
Stephen King It
Stephen King It
27 nov 08
Voto:
Even those you mentioned after King are garbage along with him. Unintentionally, you made a great comparison. I read It with difficulty, of course, and it's a mortal bore and overly verbose. De gustibus. I respect your opinions.
Stephen King It
Stephen King It
27 nov 08
Voto:
There must be a reason why the global critics snub it. Mass success isn't necessarily garbage. My attitude towards such phenomena, however, is one of suspicion; that’s it. My position wasn’t an axiom, just a description of my approach to everything that is mass-produced. And King is grossly mass-produced.
Stephen King It
Stephen King It
26 nov 08
Voto:
Fuck, I'm dyslexic.
Stephen King It
Stephen King It
26 nov 08
Voto:
Of course, it's a personal opinion. Let's say it's a wasted talent. And anyway, when a success is global, one must start to wonder if it's not garbage.
San Matteo Il Vangelo
Voto:
Anyway, I think it's a text full of great teachings. I believe that the gospel is full of principles that are more than shareable and that the world would be a better place if we were able to follow them. And this is regardless of whether one is a believer or not. Naturally, the church is not capable at all of embodying its spirit and is in blatant contradiction with the word it should represent and promote.
San Matteo Il Vangelo
Voto:
If you make jokes (which are funny, by the way), at least cite the source because they aren't yours but Luttazzi's.
Stephen King It
Stephen King It
25 nov 08
Voto:
King = junk literature.
Guns N' Roses Chinese Democracy
Voto:
I must also say that you have done much better in many other reviews. This one is truly bad.
Guns N' Roses Chinese Democracy
Voto:
Okay, I read it and guess what? I already knew the story about the guns (really?) and in the remaining three lines you basically say nothing about the album except for tearing it down in a failed attempt to be caustic. You figure out whether it was worth writing this nonsense and if you added anything even remotely interesting with it. Anyway, a review fitting for the album.