Opel

"WE ALL HAVE A SHADOW... AND YOU CAN'T GET RID OF IT!!! RIGHT WAYNE?"

This movie is AMAZING!!! I’m not saying it surpasses Pulp Fiction, but it stuck in my mind more. Tommy Lee Jones is exceptional!!!

Nice cover!

"The second one is a ballad (one of the few) characterized by the use of instruments." BRILLIANT :)!!! Anyway, if you're really 12 years old, you write way too well. 3 for encouragement.

Well done and super smooth!!!

I sincerely hope you change your mind, DaveJon!!! :) If I found my way to this site, it’s also thanks to your wonderful reviews! You were one of the first who made an impression on me (alongside Hal) when I started reading comments a while ago—whether it was your musical knowledge, your way of expressing yourself, or simply the fact that your nickname is that of the guitarist of my (and your) ultimate band. I bid you farewell and hope to see your new reviews in the future.

Hahaha nice trick! RIGHT MOUSE BUTTON. UPDATE EVERY - CUSTOMIZE - ACTIVATE - 0m / 1s

Dearest Gnembar, I can go back to school to learn manners, but it seems to me that the only one who has offended here is you, calling me a "guitto" and trivial! I’ll admit I can be a bit trivial (as you say), but "guitto" is not really a term that suits me. The fact remains that your writing is becoming increasingly artificial and pretentious! Why, instead of getting upset about criticism, don’t you try writing your next review in a manner that’s not, I won’t say less banal, but more simple and heartfelt! For example, why don’t you write a nice review of "First Utterance" by Comus since there seem to be (if I’m not mistaken) a couple that weren’t very well written. If you don’t know them, give them a listen. I’M COUNTING ON YOU, DAMMIT!!!!!

"when saying that the true ranking is that of the most liked" sorry, I meant preferred.

My sincerest compliments, beautiful writing (immediately among the recommended), truly great John, I almost started to cry, but it's not a review! As Hal says, it's something more important, that goes beyond the simple and stupid review, but I'm here to rate the review, right? And now what's happening, ocram comes along to break the balls, because not everyone thinks like him?? Why doesn't the writing appear among the most appreciated (how much I regret it)? In this regard, I fully support Paolos in saying that the real ranking is that of the most appreciated, otherwise any mistakenly given vote skews the average. Anyway, this isn't so much about the fact that the text doesn't reflect my review tastes, but for all those who, like ocram, do not understand that in this world there is freedom of thought and speech, and if Paolos decided that the review was a 4, I don't understand what the hell you want to tell him!!! THE GUILLOTINE SENTENCES!!! ocram: "didn't you have anything else to do??? weren't you supposed to get rid of your fleas??? weren't you supposed to count the blades of grass in your mediocre garden???", "I ask the editors to delete the comment of that 'user' who calls himself paolos (and also mine which would lose its meaning) as soon as possible... I invite anyone who passes by here to reiterate my request to the editors to delete the 'spit of paolos'... thanks." Now what are you going to do, will you also crucify Nerodisera because, according to him, the review flows a bit poorly in some points????