UhuhPanicoUhuh

DeRank ™: 7,14

DeAge™ : 6755 days • Here since 13 december 2007

Guy-Manuel de Homem-Christo & Thomas Bangalter Technologic (Daft Punk Music Videoclip)

5 jul 09

Voto:

@42: what I mean is that the evaluation should be comprehensive and impartial. If a video has enormous hidden significance but the video itself is nothing special, it doesn't necessarily deserve a 5. The English term "overall" drives me crazy; for everything else, there's the description. Do you understand what lies behind my "best video"? (and okay, in the past I gave 5s to a lot of things that didn't deserve it either, forced by the irrational enthusiasm of the novelty it represented for me to review)

Guy-Manuel de Homem-Christo & Thomas Bangalter Technologic (Daft Punk Music Videoclip)

5 jul 09

Voto:

Oh well, if you quote GustavoTanz and the other one...

Guy-Manuel de Homem-Christo & Thomas Bangalter Technologic (Daft Punk Music Videoclip)

5 jul 09

Voto:

@Bartle: But the same author also draws (at least a little) inspiration from the song, your argument holds, as indeed films based on books are credited to the director, but there is a rights acquisition there. As you say, the piece would be exploited for free, while in the case of music videos the collaboration is more minimal, a director is paid to put images to a song, there’s no real free interpretation. @42: Here we enter into a broader discussion of evaluation criteria, but I’ll revisit that later. (Sunday Lunch for Me too)

Guy-Manuel de Homem-Christo & Thomas Bangalter Technologic (Daft Punk Music Videoclip)

5 jul 09

Voto:

it's a music video, not a short/feature film

Guy-Manuel de Homem-Christo & Thomas Bangalter Technologic (Daft Punk Music Videoclip)

5 jul 09

Voto:

In my opinion, no Bartle, the song is at the core of everything, it is the origin; without it, the video wouldn’t exist, it would be like crediting the acoustic versions to the designer of the cover.