Rooftrampler92

Having a critical spirit is important, and I think I have it, in my own way; you judge without knowing the person on the other side of the screen, and that doesn’t sit well with me. I don’t think I’ve ever shown signs of arrogance; on the contrary, you’re the only one who keeps going with this story, perhaps precisely because you don’t like seeing a 16-year-old kid like me expressing a judgment on an album that is sacrosanct to you. The important thing is to know how to argue; neither age nor various nonsense matters. Then, honestly, there was nothing critical in my comment. I simply made obvious observations and a subjective placement of the album in question. Of course, this is just one hell of a shameful society.

@ alessio: enough is enough. I would say the big word discrimination, given your waste of words for a useless comment, a topic addressed a thousand times that you still stubbornly insist on pushing forward. I’m sixteen and I like music, what the hell should I do? Wait until I’m of age to listen to a musical note? Seriously, come on. The sadness is yours, since you have nothing better to say. Instead of bothering sixteen-year-old newbies trying to express their passion without harming anyone, you must have something better to do and say. And now I can go back to stuffing my face with candies and lollipops, maybe while listening to a bit of jazz.

First of all, congratulations on the review that perfectly represents the album. I must say that it is definitely, as you rightly point out, a live recording that is far from clean, full of dirt, and for me, that’s where the beauty lies; it’s a visceral and authentic live performance, with all the grime never cleaned up. You can feel the sweat in the singing, the blood pumping, Iggy’s movements. It feels like a live album that takes you impactfully, directly onto the stage. I place it, not at all for political or revolutionary importance, close to "Kick Out the Jams" by MC5. I admit I’ve listened to very few live albums in my life, but these two stand out precisely for their similar naturalness; it all sounds authentically captured, elongated sounds, distorted, half-wrong guitar riffs, the voice of Iggy screaming and writhing continuously, creating a dissonance. In short, I appreciate Metallic K.O. precisely for this.

He's not a singer-songwriter I've delved into much; I only know his iconic songs, which still aren't enough for a general overview. The review is very good.

Sorry for the five that slipped out during the recording...

I’ve never listened to the album; I’ve only heard “Maggie May” by Stewart. Anyway, great review and a nice mention.

Where do we leave "Planet Caravan"???

Review perhaps a bit too rhetorical for my taste, but it knows exactly where it's headed. Beautiful.

Junio, you sent me an email about a week ago, but I can't use email and I don't know why, so I'm replying here (I don't know if you'll ever read this response).
Anyway, I agree that on Ondarock there are too many people caught up in musical speculation, and they forget true rock 'n roll, snubbing the Zeppelins or whatever other band that has been able to identify the true character of rock 'n roll.
The first of the J's A is an amazing live album, no doubt about it. And as for the Paw, yes, when I saw the names of Farrel and Navarro in your review, my eyes lit up, however, after listening, Dragline is overall a nice album but it doesn’t reach the heights of Jane's crossover. Also, keep in mind that back then I was much more caught up in visceral and wild rock 'n roll than I am now. Even today I don't mind (in this case) a good listen to early '90s crossover.

A commercially significant album. I've never fully appreciated them; I recognize that they have a notable taste (also enjoyable) in composition, very neat, strongly arranged, a solid product. Not bad, and then, honestly, who hasn't found themselves humming one of their anthems?