Frankie89

Three whole months spent on this milestone of literature were worth it because I then used it as a topic for my graduation exam, and it went quite well. When you read that final sentence, you really feel rewarded... In short, if you haven’t read it, don’t talk shit if you have to discuss literature… or really anything else -.-

Oops, how careless.

Despite the 1 I gave it a while ago, I must say I've changed my mind over time. One day when I didn't have much to do, I picked up that book and placed it on a piece of paper on my desk. The window was open, a cold winter breeze was coming in, and numerous university papers on the desk started to flutter around. All of them except the one covered by Twilight, which, thanks to its hard cover, wouldn't open. There you go, a great paperweight, that is.

Damn, these guys are the new Daft Punk (already a bit out of fashion). They make your skull vibrate like only the Chemicals of Dig your blabla could do. Truly ignorant electronics. I'm eagerly awaiting a complete masterpiece. Check out their live performance with a super cheesy dance version of Master Of Puppets (totally crazy, for real!).

music reviews ...xD Mistakes aside, it's commendable to find someone who dares to review albums that, inevitably, whether due to actual misery or the arrogance of critics, will be torn apart with scores of 1. Personally, I'm not familiar with the album, but I might allow it a quick listen in the future...

Here! Here!! Here!!! One of the many reasons why this book is a piece of junk is this. I've heard this refrain from too many people: "I read all 4 books because even if the story was childish, I couldn't not know how it ended...". I felt that way too just a few seconds after closing the book and frowning, but I quickly turned that feeling into disgust. And yes, because I remembered very well that the author had churned out three more of these, and suddenly, I despised this ... thing even more, rightly labeling it as a vulgar marketing strategy. Nothing more than a dull little story, conveniently left hanging. But this is not literature; it’s something that’s better off rotting on the shelves, although unfortunately, that hasn't been the case. Honestly, I think a book shouldn’t resemble a season of Lost (especially not a season of Lost written by a bird and filmed with its butt).

beautiful little songs gently melodic

I had it on cassette and as a kid I used to watch it obsessively. My favorite scene is the lair of the beast... Awesome.

Sure, I also messed up a couple of times while writing the comment. It's like "ihaveitallinmyheadbutcan'tputitint owordsandiskeepforgettingtoreaditto thoroughly"... I hope it's still understandable.
Sayonara, again!

For Portland: ugh, okay, maybe my previous response was overly caustic and bordering on bias. But let me tell you a few things:
-1) Why do you, like many beings on debaser, vote multiple times? It’s rude and undemocratic. Sorry, I’m using this opportunity to express my ignorable dissent; I’m not targeting you specifically;
-2) I am targeting you specifically for another reason. If you think I haven't read the review, then let me think you haven't read my review, or that you read it hurriedly with some anger since I was tarnishing something that you really like (given the multiple 5s). There are a few details that one cannot know without having read the book, don’t you think? Do you perhaps suppose that I read other reviews and articles to then build a review based on prejudices?
-3) If you reread my review, you’ll realize that the comparison with the Mocciosi books (which I, by the way, have read… partly out of masochism, partly to study the phenomenon of "mass teenage coprophagia". The same reasons I really read Twilight) is barely mentioned. I talked about those books just to point out that, for the same type of potential target, in general, they were written in a less terrifying way than the aforementioned little book. For the rest, in the actual review of the book, I tried not to excuse it with the mitigating factor of being "young adult literature" (that is, that type of literature for which, by its nature, we are less demanding when judging it) or even the "harmony" genre. Rather, I pointed out its flaws as a more general example of “bad narrative”;
-4) I haven’t seen the film. But I watch the news: hordes of girls queuing for miles at the cinemas not just for the adaptation of the book itself, but also for a certain Rob Pattinson. Here, tell me, is the comparison with 3msc justified, or not?
-5) What else can I say? If you don’t like my review, you can write one yourself. It's that simple. I promise I won’t comment on it, or at most, I’ll comment without ratings.
Sayonara!