maxgit

Well... I’ve said quite a few inaccuracies, I discover, but thanks to the commentators (I beg your pardon, I’m an amateur Baptist, I really know very little. However, I'm starting to fill in the gaps with the records that Embryo recommends).

...I didn't read your review on purpose before, because I wanted to write mine too (and I did). Now that I've read it, I find it beautiful, and I endorse it as well (where do I sign?)! Hi braVO, long live LUCIO. SUPER VOTE FOR THE REVIEW AND THE ALBUM.

OK, thanks!

What an accident to find you...
Well done Mariaelena! You can't understand how romantic we were in the 80s without listening to this album. I say this without diminishing the value of C Cross, and of an album that I loved without restraint (and even bought again because the cassette had worn out—just for the record, the album is in the top 100 of the best-selling albums of the decade, it’s a masterpiece of elegance): I was there too, right in the mix, and I was younger...! Mr. Cross must have grown up too, and I rush to buy Windows (but was it before Bill Gates?). Anyway, I will always remember the carefree joy and tenderness, and the trust of an Arthur's Theme (yes, it’s still him), as the precious gem and symbol of an era that no longer exists.

Yes, you are right, J.S. Bach. If you listen a bit to the instrumentals of this same record, you'll notice that some of the intertwining of the bass voice with the flute carrying the melody reminds you of those famous concertos, and also in the search for that same sound impact. However, one cannot help but notice that... the instruments that characterize this record are more or less the same sections of the...
Johann Sebastian Bach
(1685-1750) Brandenburg Concerto No. 1 in F major BWV 1046, for two horns, three oboes, bassoon, violin, strings, and continuo
[Allegro]
Adagio
Allegro - Adagio - Allegro
Menuet - Trio I - Menuet
Polonaise
Menuet - Trio II - Menuet

I would like to know more about trickyid's comment ... are you there?
Hi and thanks to all the commentators.

I would like to know more about trickyid's comment ... are you there?
Hi and thanks to all the commentators.

nice review, and also the comments (I share Mr. Natoli's impressions)! brighter later!!

Hey! Hi. Not seeing how many reviews were already on this album, I added mine... which will magically appear on this site, I hope... anyway, I wrote yet another enthusiastic review, I believe. And I thank andy66 for raising the discussion. Because it gives me a chance to think about at least two things:
it's true what he says that an artist should be judged for their music, and not get carried away by the persona, but if we listen to their albums with a clear mind, perhaps we can understand everything that needs to be understood - that’s a great reflection ;-)
- however, I don’t think that, all in all, andy’s review really seems like a review to me. I didn’t quite get what you wrote, andy. Why don’t you like Nick Drake? You could explain it to us ;-)
It can’t be about the voice... it was said that even Bob Dylan didn’t have that great of a voice...
Anyway, it would be interesting to discuss: what is a true 'review' anyway? And what kind of persona should a true 'music critic' be (and not a critic-1)?