Contemplazione

Well, I'm not really left behind... I've got broad shoulders! And old is what you'll be ;)

I have Mozilla Firefox (is that the browser? Sorry, I don't know much about the internet).

@Editors: can't reviews be submitted anymore? The DeScrivila page is a complete mess, and it says my password is wrong... I tried to contact you via your email but that gives an error too. What should I do? Sorry Roma for taking up your space, I took the first commented page.

Get moving, lazybones...

@ford: silence distracts me... @Muffin: thanks to the site you pointed out, I will make sure to get them. You can never find anything in stores... not even Evan Parker! A few days ago I sent him an order, but for other goodies; which who knows, will someday be the subject of other reviews. @ZiOn: I'll take note, thanks.

Hello bjorkina! I wonder how much they would charge for the ticket, that smelly one... worse than Jarrett, I imagine ;)

Thank you all for the visit and the comments. A record to listen to, at the very least you'll definitely have a couple of laughs... Odra, you might be right about Dalì; it’s not the best comparison. They only share a strong visionary power, but indeed the points of contact end here. Bacon might be more akin, I don't know, but I find him a bit dark, and this music isn't. Perhaps if I had to associate it with a graphic image, I would think of crazed shards of graphite on rough white paper, or violent splashes of white and red paint on a black background. But not random, rather possessing a certain shape!

Are you seriously convinced that the terms "jazz-fusion" and "progressive" describe Bach's music?

Belero, I think I haven't explained myself well... I wasn't referring to the presence of these names in your review (I’m copying and pasting): Crimson, Caravan, Yes, Van Der Graaf, Oldfield. I'm the first to explore different genres; I’m far from engaging in a silly debate like: if you like Bach, then you must hate Neil Young! Simply, when you wrote the review, you checked the boxes relating to these genres: classical, jazz-fusion, progressive. Now, since none of these genre boxes were checked by default, I assumed (I presume) that you had checked them intentionally to describe the work in your review! Hence the question I asked you: "But why 'jazz-fusion' and 'progressive'?" In short, it’s like someone writing a review about Metallica and checking: Trash-Metal (Ok), Jazz (??..NO!), New Age (...NO!!). Do you see what I mean now?

Yes, but why "jazz-fusion" and "progressive"? Spill the beans...