OleEinar

DeRank ™: 11,31

DeAge™ : 6933 days • Here since 16 june 2007

The Beatles Abbey Road

1 jan 09

Voto:

"Taken individually, the songs of this album do not justify its beauty, while together they make it unreachable." I believe that for this extraordinary discovery you will be awarded the Nobel Prize ;-) Nothing personal whereis..., I'm just advising you to avoid making multiple copies of well-known records like this one. Then, of course, you're free to do as you please, bye!

The Beatles Abbey Road

1 jan 09

Voto:

Much more than 10 dear Jasmine (who knows which user is hiding behind this nice little name?). These are not my words, but they express well what I think about the usefulness of a site like debaser. @popolo, thank you for qualifying my personal opinions as "bullshit." New releases are posted, but they disappear from the homepage much faster (and thus have less visibility) when surrounded by a sea of crap and useless duplicates. If a duplicate truly expresses an innovative or personal viewpoint (and this is certainly not the case), I am the first to commend it. Finally, discussions about the Beatles on debaser are always the same, done and redone a thousand times across all the dozens of reviews present. Haloah

The Beatles Abbey Road

1 jan 09

Voto:

Of course you can review whatever you like (not caring about the rules that Debaser asks you to follow), just like I can say that your page is completely useless. "Social review" is really funny, truly.

The Beatles Abbey Road

1 jan 09

Voto:

And above all, do we still need to give that scruffy Neu! the chance to tell us for the millionth time his interesting and original opinion on the Beatles?

The Beatles Abbey Road

1 jan 09

Voto:

So Donnie, why don't we do 100 reviews of this album? That way we’ll flood the site with useless material, endlessly repeating well-known things that have already been said and written millions of times in millions of places, taking away space and visibility from new, little-known, and perhaps interesting proposals. I'm not saying the review is poorly done, but its only utility is to stimulate the orgasm of some fanatic ready to ejaculate at every praise directed at their idols. Or do we still need someone in 2009 to tell us how beautiful the Beatles' songs are? (Discussions that have already been had millions of times, but apparently to no avail.)

The Beatles Abbey Road

1 jan 09

Voto:

"Check with the DeSearch engine that the album you want to review is not already in the magical DeDatabase. If it is, it's up to you to decide whether or not it's still worth writing a review: maybe yes (you have something else to say), but maybe not. This site is awesome if and because everyone contributes, sharing their musical knowledge and enriching each other. I talk to you about an album you don't know, you talk to me about an album I don't know: that's the only way to broaden our respective musical knowledge. There are people here who treat the homepage like a public bathroom, where they toss out (numerous) review rants to let the world know (and even poorly) that they like bands whose life/death and miracles everyone knows."

Oxbow King Of The Jews

1 jan 09

Voto:

A truly commendable de-review to start the new year off right.

Cradle of Filth Midian

31 dec 08

Voto:

I contribute to the cause. Take that!

Terra Di Nessuno My Moto

31 dec 08

Voto:

No human cases no party

270bis Incantesimi D'Amore

31 dec 08

Voto:

But do you only listen to right-wing groups? No, because I don't see any other connections between this shit group (on YouTube - unfortunately - there's a whole song, not just 20 seconds, which would be more than enough to induce vomiting) and Museo Rosenbach (who had a good progressive album in the early '70s). Well, your nickname already qualifies you enough.