OleEinar

I agree with Alessio on all points. Hi and happy new year :)

We just needed the Great Moralizer. It seems to me that in these pages the reviewed object is merely a pretext to publish personal stories (truthful or fabricated as they may be) that have little or nothing to do with the album in question. Highlighting the "soul" of the reviewer is quite another matter. Then, by all means, as a literary case, it can also stand.

What the hell!

<< PS: I voted the album incorrectly, the stars are 5, if it can be corrected, please :-) >>, and it did seem strange to me that our star had given less than 5 to yet another extraordinary masterpiece by this amazing band.

Perhaps the most beautiful page you have written. An interesting proposal about a character who apparently deserves to be known.

The answer to your comments is already contained in my previous posts, donnie.

Maximum liberalism in the sense that it is requested and not imposed to follow rules regarding the submission of reviews. However, this does not mean that one should take advantage of this freedom to do whatever they want, I believe. Just because something is permitted (or tolerated) does not mean it is also appropriate. At least that's how I see it.

@wildthing, these are things you need to ask the staff members or those who handle the ban. I imagine that whoever made this decision had their reasons, but I know nothing about the matter. (The not understanding a damn thing was referring to the discussion about different users, anyway). @popolo, indeed the opportunity is granted for the principles of maximum liberalness of the site (the same ones for which your idea of a two-speed hp and a junk page - even though there is already the page for literary cases - will probably never be realized), I just think that one should think twice before taking advantage of that opportunity (I don’t see why a newbie should necessarily send their review of a masterpiece from their favorite band here, for that there are personal blogs). @whereis, I’m sorry for the acidity then, nothing personal. happy 2009.

@whereis, 80 percent of the votes I give to reviews are 5 and 4. For the rest, it's just that people often mess around here, so don't take it personally.

Oh my God, to be honest, I don't control a damn thing! I'm not part of the staff, I can't know about double identities nor can I ban anyone. I'm just a regular user who, like many others, thought it was appropriate to make a (small) donation to support the coolest website on the web! This is just to clarify, since there are people who think they understand everything but actually don't understand a damn thing.