Voto:
Well, mien_mo_man, it’s not like seeing three reviews of Todd Rundgren or Mike Scott on the first page of Debaser is that exciting. Sure, it’s always better than Albano, but I still think it’s a load of crap, in my opinion, eh?
Voto:
And why on earth should they remove useless or provocative reviews if they get two thousand views and a hundred comments? Let's start ignoring them when they’re published instead of rushing to comment that she’d better act like a slut or Albano is a cuckold.
Voto:
ah ah ah not every day but Thursday and Friday ...incredible... saint words bartleboom but as you see I think your outing is destined to scratch the conscience for a few hours and then the publications will restart the same way because for some it’s a sort of vice. And given the times we live in, saying certain things comes with the risk of being labeled as a little professor or a sour principal, eh eh eh. The real fact is that several valid reviewers haven’t posted in a while, any names? don junio or lewis tollani. Who knows why.
Voto:
...and let's put this little legend so we can understand nothing (if it can help) in evaluations. Normally, on a scale from 1 to 5, where 5 is the masterpiece or excellent, 4 should be good and 3 sufficient, 2 mediocre, and 1 to be thrown in the toilet or burned (since there’s no zero). What do you think?
Voto:
...go screw yourself, go!
Voto:
@Bartleboom, it seems absolutely normal to me that Poletti's comments spark chaos, because they are pompous and foolish. How can you judge someone who makes this statement: "Then, just to respond to Supersoul, the grading scale I've already written once: for me, the value of grades is this (like it or not): 1=4; 2=6; 3=7; 4=8; 5=10. So, having given a 2 to 'Baciami stupido', I gave it a 6. A stretched passing mark, but still a passing mark." So we are all fools because the conventional scale of Debaser from 1 to 5 has 3 in the middle, which in any civilized country would mean passing, let’s say for clarity a six on a scale from one to ten. And instead NO! we must understand that for Poletti, a passing mark is a 2, so all of us, whether we like it or not, have to adapt to his grading scale, and we must remember that every time he votes... whether we like it or not!
Voto:
and I emphasize that IT SEEMS stupid to ME...
Voto:
Stoney dickhead, but damn it, here you have to sweat buckets to explain yourself: you can do whatever the hell you want on Debaser just like in life, and I'm not going to tell you that you can't shovel shit (where we come from, those who do this old job to acquire organic fertilizer for the fields are called "merdaioli"). What seems stupid to me is your statement that the only weapon we have to oppose the media power of certain people is to fill them with insults. Period. And instead, it is precisely on the necessity that people like you have to say that Albano’s wife gives blowjobs that these people foundation their media power. So there will always be Buona Domenica and Stranamore. Therefore, the Supersoul of the moment meant to say do whatever the hell you want: comment… don’t comment… but then in the comments don’t come whining that Iscian is posting streams of sperm about Gabriel Pontello, Albano’s reviews, or some whore, as long as he has two thousand contacts he has every right to do so. AriPoint.
Voto:
...and then I've already kicked your ass in my review of Zappa, haven't you learned to steer clear of supersoul yet?
Voto:
@there: around here, they say "if you have an intelligent child, make him an engineer; if he's a fool, make him an architect." I bet you're an architect: ONLYforADULTS is me....