azzo

Dear Lewis, my words have no shiny veneer. They are simply a reflection that was made twenty years ago in the social centers, and seems to me the most lucid of all those that I continue to hear. On the other hand, if I may, it's hard to believe that 30% of people, which seems to be the result in Veneto for the League, is composed solely of rough and ignorant individuals. The problem remains, for me, that. Continuing to dismiss the League phenomenon as a horde of deficient barbarians (there are also those). But as long as the analysis stops there, we get nowhere. After that, if you come to tell me that the communist worker of the '70s went to see Pasolini, while the small entrepreneur of the zeroes is dumbed down by TV, we also agree. But mass education has failed. And the insult towards the racist League supporter doesn’t seem to lead anywhere. Or does it?

In my humble opinion, the analyses about the League that I read, and this one is no exception, as well as the subsequent posts, always seem a bit weak. I see this as one of the major failures of the left in recent years. Labeling League supporters as racist and microcephalic is very easy, but also rather reductive. The League, let’s not forget, was born from one side within the industrial triangle of Milan-Turin-Genoa, and on the other in the very Catholic Veneto. In the first case, due to the advent of post-Fordism. To give an example, Fiat practically halved its workforce in the 1980s. What happened to these workers? They became small business owners. Fiat no longer makes parts in-house but outsources the work. It is clear that the worker transformed into a small entrepreneur, craftsman, or employee of a small business no longer has the needs of the mass worker. For this reason, they no longer vote for the Communist Party and its subsequent derivatives, but for a party that claims to want to act in their interest. It’s the exact same person, only that when they voted for the PC they were a comrade, and now they have become a racist piece of trash. I've been hearing these arguments for twenty years, and nothing has changed. Regarding the white Venetians, the analysis is much simpler: the PC has never existed there, the DC has always been in control, and when it collapsed, it was inevitable that votes would go to a party that protects farmers (even there, there are no more peasants, but agricultural entrepreneurs). Ultimately, it's too late now; the left has continued to hold its nose up in the air and will never regain support. It’s inevitable that, at this point, they will also take votes in Emilia. Another point is that sometimes the right merits are acknowledged: Minister of the Interior Maroni seems to have achieved better results in the fight against the mafia than many other ministers; Zaia has done more for agriculture in two years than all post-war ministers. Or should we talk about the splendid results of Mastella in Justice, or Turco in Health? I should clarify, before receiving the expected insults, that I am not a supporter of the League; I just try to look at things a bit objectively and understand why they happen.

Nice page, Isi, it's about time. It makes you want to grab it. But a couple of samples, right?

Well, yes, it's been a while since I referenced him, but the closing line of the Vortex in the first post says it all. However, he goes a bit overboard with the romanticism. We know what "Orrore" refers to, and those are matters too lofty. Tondelli, on the other hand, was just awful. A classic example of a sad queer, saved by the arc. Paradigmatic of this shitty Italy, a red thread that in thirty years from Craxi has led to Berlusconi. And this has been the narrative. Of small things. And the fact that it is now also a source of regret makes me even sadder. Double ome, for once.

But what did I understand, Gabri? Can you explain it to me? Anyway, I agree with Paloz, better Marsh.. Rece has some nice points, like the closing, but you can't give him five, otherwise Spiderland is at twelve. And the hardcore, or rather the ardcooree?

Ah, just to say, I find Albarn quite interesting. And of monstrous talent. If you're really insisting, Gabri, I'll gift him to you. But I wouldn’t want you going around saying that I'm rather monotonous with gifts.

I mention the competition, but it’s a rather shareable live report.
Pagina non trovata | SENTIREASCOLTARE

But did you buy it on CD or vinyl? If you have it on vinyl, I'll buy it from you for thirty thousand, so you can make a deal too.

The reception isn't bad, it was already there, and the other one is better. Aside from this, there’s a glaring mistake. Roback was making psychedelia when grunge was still in middle school. And long before grunge, the paisley underground had us fall in love for more than one summer. So there’s no contradiction, it’s really something else. Alia76’s post is embarrassing. Every now and then, it’s worth looking beyond one’s own tastes. I have no intention of re-educating you; I would just like to know what is objectively beautiful for you. The greatness of Mazzy Star lies in its simplicity. Far from flatness. And a song like "Fade into you" simply has no words.

No, no. This little disc is a small pearl. And it opens up, in those years, a whole little ancient world. There’s the Hammond, Burgess's stunning voice, one of the best of the last two decades in England, the punctual little guitar, a beautifully rounded bass. And that lazy rhythm que j'adore. Recently re-listened to, it reminds me of Milanese streets on loop, happy to go dance. Bah! What a silly review...