azzo

Nice review. I'll try to catch up. A little more attention to the order and you'll be at 5.

I was there. Not completely satisfied though. But maybe it’s my fault: too many concerts in my life. The point of uncertainty. The guitars. Maybe too low, maybe it's the open air... Who knows? A certain "closure of sound." Then, talking about it last night at dinner with a friend, we had seen them in '92, but we didn’t know each other, he pointed out that anyway, that is the sound of "Daydream Nation." So maybe it’s me. Great review. And did you notice the tremendous work of Shelley, often underrated? One of the things he taught me many years ago was to keep the beat even in moments of chaos or feedback. I always recommend this to every drummer I meet.

Thank you all. To whom it may concern, also the EP "Scream with a view." "Where interests lie" is where the heart beats, and maybe it stops... then it starts beating again... and stops once more.

I forgive you because you are from '91. But how can one assert that "(...) here the Pink Floyd confront themselves for the first time with the song format" ??!!! All the early singles by Pink Floyd are among the most beautiful "songs" in history!!!

Good job there. Finally, someone who brings some order. The transition from "The train.." to "Stroll on" is perhaps the shift from blues-rock to hard rock? Only time will tell... To Happypippo, I'm sorry to highlight that your arguments are not very Aristotelian... there is a beautiful version of Chop Suey by Richard Cheese...

Prince and sex, now that's where it works. But how does it work? There's a censored section, where it seems you're in good company. But if you don't give me the link, how do I get there? And how did you end up there? In any case, I'm not too fond of this censored thing. Blackdog free! P.S: if blasphemy is involved, I'm on board with that too. Odious remarks about pedophilia, you know I would censor those as well. But a bit of fun, come on… Blackdog free to celebrate!

Mi dispiace, ma non hai fornito un testo completo da tradurre. Per favore, invia il testo che desideri che traduca e sarò felice di aiutarti.

Oh! Oh oh! Oh oh oh! Finally, I can give you a nice 2 as well. Esssaipeccchè? Because just seeing an "x" instead of "for" in a letter, a postcard, or a text message drives me crazy, let alone in a review. Especially when you would actually have talent, because then the review is nice, but you waste it. You're as annoying as Recoba nine Sundays out of ten. Using "ke" doesn't make you cool; it's much harder to write while respecting the rules of grammar. And why do you always have to bring it back to sex? There are plenty of bands to associate with that, but these, definitely not. They’re hopeless romantics. Just like you.

I have never talked about Metal, because even "Helter Skelter" isn't. It's hard rock. Just like "Stroll On," which doesn't seem to have any other titles, and anyway, it was recorded back in September 1966, and the Yardbirds played it live throughout the summer of 1966. And it's one of the very first tracks where feedback is used.

I don't want to get tangled in unnecessary and pointless controversies. However, I thank Easycure for pointing out that I mentioned specific groups and dates. That said: I couldn't care less if the receiver has documented himself on The Beatles' reviews but has never listened to The Litter; that's not my fault. @Happypippo: what does the blues-rock repertoire of the Yardbirds have to do with "Stroll On"? That's what I cited. If you were doing covers of the chicken scratching, you must have seen "Blow Up" as well. Everything that will be developed into hard rock by Page with the Zeppelin is already there. Reiterating that "Helter Skelter" foreshadows metal seems to me to be utterly unfounded. It is true, however, that the Beatles inevitably listened to the Who. And it’s also true that "Born to Be Wild" is from 1968. So, I reiterate: thanks Beatles, but to Caesar what is Caesar's.