Deneil

I saw them at the Heineken last year... such a trashy and redneck vibe that isn't found anywhere else... and then with that horrible logo hanging behind... they’re good just for slamming into each other at 4 in the afternoon...

The dreamers ugly because:
1) the direction: overly polished and sophisticated to the point of being ridiculous... by sophisticated I mean a direction that tries to be like the direction of "The Graduate" (full of angles and blablabla) but ends up being just nerve-racking.
2) the actors: Pitt is ridiculous and she (I don’t remember her name because I saw it last year or maybe 2 years ago) seems like the embodiment of a stuck-up attitude... she has nothing to do with this film!
3) the theme of transgression is carried out with such subtlety (Pitt licking her pussy) that not even an elephant in a crystal shop could pull it off... and if we want to eliminate this, I would say that this idealism, this indulging in every desire is frankly ridiculous and feels like a caricature of the described period.
4) Bertolucci has done much better.
Of course, Poletti will have other reasons that I would be curious to know, but these are mine.

But has anyone seen The Dreamers by Bertolucci??? I dare anyone to defend that crap!

Great review! The spice?? Oh my God... blackdog speaks Italian like you’re Mariottide...

I completely agree with donjunio's comment, which fully aligns with festwca's, and I add that in some ways it might remind one a bit of broken arrow… if only for the electric rides that you never know where they lead… and sometimes, they don't end up anywhere at all!

Here there will be the usual (the usuals) who will say that the Beatles are overrated, they’re crap, they didn’t invent anything, long live Captain Beefheart, the Pink Floyd were better, the Stones too, my aunt played before the Beatles...

I have the first one, the legendary Deja Vu with Young (in my opinion, three notches above the first album) and the last one again with Young... which I can't recall the name of right now... I still need to get this one and that one from '77 in addition to the one from '80 and something else with Young that seems to be terrible... great review!

ah, but I didn't realize I was talking to the classic debaserian imbecile (no offense to anyone, but only certain people can be found here... obviously, there are also many intelligent people!) sorry... I wrote "in my opinion," I don't know if you noticed.. "I REPEAT I REVIEW HEAVY METAL NOT CRAP. SO IN THIS CASE THIS IS A HEAVY METAL ALBUM, THOSE YOU PRAISE NOT!" by frank ah, there you go.. then I’ll leave you all the space for your delusions as someone with a mind more closed than a sloth... very good! yours is a beautiful review written incredibly well and heavy metal is the best, and there’s nothing else! just great!

5?????? but please.. in my opinion, Streets and even the last album are superior.. then I completely agree with the judge.. what are all those ellipses for? are you at the bar talking, taking pauses for reflection! and then it’s not a timeless classic! this record has aged like few others, even Killers by Maiden is more timeless than this thing.

absolutely superior to the incredible..one of Pixar's best along with Toy Story and Monsters, Inc..absolutely a must-see!