emofiliaco

DeRank ™: 0,05

DeAge™ : 7053 days • Here since 17 february 2007

Love Contact

The Beatles Abbey Road

13 jul 07

Voto:

The final You in the penultimate post was a Tuto here, I have problems with the fox tonight...

The Beatles Abbey Road

13 jul 07

Voto:

I fully agree with the Judge!

@Ajeje: I’m not copying your statement, but you clearly say that you get angry when people speak out of prejudice, so you think that Longlive was speaking without knowing what he was talking about, when instead he was just expressing a personal opinion (of course he didn’t put “in my opinion” in front, but here, I repeat, no one does that). This seemed a bit presumptuous to me because it’s an even more annoying rebuttal than an insult; it’s depressing that when someone doesn’t think like you, you immediately accuse them of not understanding, of speaking out of prejudice, etc. etc. when instead (I don’t know if it’s the case with Longlive, but I am naturally a guarantor) maybe there are foundations behind it. You.

The Beatles Abbey Road

13 jul 07

Voto:

Afterward, I questioned the idea of Ajeje, going to a question mark, that is, the sentence would be "But why was I questioning the idea of Ajeje?"

The Beatles Abbey Road

13 jul 07

Voto:

But because I was contesting Ajeje's idea, I said that Scaruffi claimed to consider one genre superior to another (and if it were just that, it wouldn't be a problem, since we all do it; it’s the way he does it, with that enlightened air, bringing forth entirely subjective motivations but passing them off as objective because he’s a good sophist, I repeat, it makes him a bit unpleasant to me. It's not an insult; I think it's not unlawful to assert this). I didn’t want to contradict him; I was sharing my experience in the debate.

The Beatles Abbey Road

13 jul 07

Voto:

Alright, it was a misunderstanding; I thought it was clear that my statement was general, in the sense that Longlive made some claims and you were a bit harsh, and I pointed it out to you. You noted that “fregnaccia” wasn't such a serious term (and you're right, but in context it took on a much more serious validity). I thought you were trying to play a bit dumb... if that's not the case, I apologize, but I consider you too intelligent; you added a bit of malice, come on, you can admit it...

The Beatles Abbey Road

13 jul 07

Voto:

No, not like that. But if I give you a speech and you try to twist it against me (knowing that I understand the game perfectly well), it’s at least a little provocation, right? ;-) True?

The Beatles Abbey Road

13 jul 07

Voto:

;-) Well, you continue to think that mine was something born from the desire to seek a clash, while it originated from the wish to find a common point of communication (all the talks about how to contest ideas, you know?). I'm sorry, maybe I explained myself poorly, I was simply speaking to you in a strict but affectionate way.

The Beatles Abbey Road

13 jul 07

Voto:

Dave, you know very well that I care about you (in a telematic way) and that if there aren’t any annoying people around (and for me you’re not one of them), I don't copy and paste other posts. Shall we bet on how many times you've charged in headfirst at the slightest disagreement, even over tastes? (And I'm not talking about provocations, insults, or anything else but mere disagreements.)