Valeriorivoli

Or perhaps the message was FARMERS of the world UNITE - signed v.rivoli

Pasolini, poultry breeder of birds for humans, petty bourgeois and cattofrociocomunista, has even managed to ruin the mask of Totò. Let’s read what the illustrious D. Cammarota says in his "Il cinema di Totò," published by Fanucci on pages 279 and following: ...Pasolini is ridiculous, Pasolini is opportunistic, Pasolini is reactionary, at the moment he cowardly tries to reduce a personality overflowing like that of Totò into a pathetic small figure of a provincial actor, trapped in a completely incoherent plot with sloppy and disgraceful dialogues, in a pseudo-moralistic and para-evangelical framework nominally on the left, but in reality vilely backward, shabby and vulgar... His is a Totò destroyed, nullified, vanished; there’s nothing left of the revolutionary mask, nothing! The ferocity, the irresistible dialectic, the skepticism, the comic opportunities... only the pale shadow of Totò remains, a phantom that walks, a misty simulacrum of an actor.
Let’s think for a moment again about the extraordinary Fra Timoteo in "La Mandragola," and the inert frate Ciccillo, what a global difference in style, plot, and ideas! "Uccellacci e uccellini" could very well bear Zeffirelli’s signature, the pseudo-hippy prelude of San Francesco from "Fratello sole, sorella luna," from Zeffirelli, a director with far too much in common with Pasolini, well beyond a common reference to an not better identified Catholicism... at the time, critics with puffed-up chests shouted miracle for the alleged co-optation of Totò into the realm of true cinema thanks to Pasolini... what message is Pasolini trying to communicate with the disjointed and bizarre chaos of "Uccellacci e uccellini"? His own religious belief? The moral pretension of the old left—the funeral of Togliatti... or what? More likely, he simply wanted to pollute and destroy a myth, Totò, out of sheer arrogance?

Venice the fat?

happypippo is not for you but for the other show-offs

What is the age of the human soul?
Just as it has the chameleon-like virtue of changing color with each new encounter,
being cheerful with those who are happy and sad with those who are depressed,
so too its age is as changeable as its mood.
Just as it has the chameleon-like virtue of changing color with each new encounter,
being cheerful with those who are happy and sad with those who are depressed,
so too its age is as changeable as its mood.
joyce
ps you’ve broken the fuckin’ balls, prave souls, we’re not in a Sergio Leone film.

Ah, I almost forgot, Dionysus is one with Hades-Heraclitus, that is, with death-ONCE AGAIN, destructive Dionysian values of the night, orgiastic, opposed to the Apollonian solar values.

It bothers me, to put it in Nietzschean terms, that catto-communist morality that wafts from every cinema - using a term of his, "aristarch" in film history - and that at university, in the humanities program focused on performing arts, they tried to force me to swallow down to my very bones. For Christ's sake, if you're Catholic, you must be fully so, not just for show; the typically Italian, self-serving Catholicism eats away at me, annoys me, just as that Italian-style communism from those years wears me down. And with well-rounded characters like our protagonist, it's even worse; I become fundamentalist. A good Catholic cannot claim to be such and simultaneously support prostitution—male prostitution, no less—while being an anticatholic communist. I have no interest in the schizoaffective splits on the confessional film of these subhuman, sick individuals. I see only a purulent chaos. POET? At least Dante Alighieri, as a poet and a Catholic, had his integrity, dignity, and clear political vision—open to criticism, but clear. Here we are lost in the foggy mists of rubbish elevated to a philosophical category. The much longed-for purism of the peasant world from our protagonist would have torn apart for his choices. We are in the darkest of shadows.

easycure I repeat, Machiavelli has been used and abused... I am not leftist, let's be clear, I respect America as a dark and ravenous ghost of Europe, that Europe born from Rome as a primordial idea, continued in the Holy Roman Empire and defeated by the Church for its universalist ends... Machiavelli spoke as a convinced anticlerical and pagan in pectore.
But his political vision is a debut; an empire cannot stand solely on economy but on a sacred vision of the world and of man. To be clear, having made Italy, it was necessary to make Italians. Machiavelli also spoke of killing Oliverotto da Fermo and with his Valentino, but the throne has been empty for centuries. As for the Masonic America, this is one of the many heads of the hydra, one of the main ones, while the rest is shared among large lobbies and mafias. Anyway, the Founding Fathers were Freemasons, the same Benjamin Franklin, America was born as a counterpoint to Europe in political ideals from its very foundation. As long as it lasts...

a remarkable film, much heavier than Bowling for Columbine. The American catastrophe is at hand, there’s nothing Tarantinian about it; here, more than irony, spaghetti, and kung fu, there’s a deathly breath.

I don't dare tell what I learned from a friend of mine who is a former inmate, who shared many things about our moralist -uranist in the 70s... it makes your skin crawl... and you who consider this pseudo priest furlan the best are as disgusting as he is. ZOZZONIIIIIIIIIII.