mien_mo_man

@ Supersoul: I have never submitted more than one review of the same artist in a single day... NEVER. I have never sent, on the same day, a review of Rundgren solo and his Utopia. NEVER. Twice I have submitted more than one review in the same day (the last time I did this was on December 8th). Often, however, it has happened that an old one was at the bottom of the list on the homepage while a new one was at the top, but I have learned my lesson: I no longer submit more than one every two to three days (p.s.: I have 44 ready, of which about ten are for the remaining Rundgren albums).

Are the editors tired of correcting others' reviews? In the past, I have experienced the exact opposite, where some reviews I wrote, edited, and proofread a thousand times (and saved in Word, and even printed) were published full of errors—spelling, punctuation, etc. Not to mention the layout and paragraph formatting: often everything was completely upended from top to bottom, and sentences I wanted to stand out in the body of the review ended up hidden in the "chaos"... This has happened many times, and many times the use of bold text in my reviews has been unfortunate and/or almost consistent with logics that only those who express themselves in algorithms can understand... But it’s not like I got mad about it!

see for example the review of ALBANO on the home page: more than 130 comments and over 2100 visitors!

And why do they complain about the stupid reviews, when they get their contacts mainly thanks to those? Not thanks to my reviews on Rundgren! :) WHAT DO WE DO? SPIT IN THE PLATE WE EAT FROM?

And then why on earth is it a bad thing to send a review a day? I did it for a long time, and if it hadn’t been that way, I wouldn’t have been able to have over 100 active reviews in eight months!

And then why do they complain about the ungrammatical reviews, written poorly, etc.? They call themselves Editors, right? So why don't the Editors quietly and resignedly dedicate themselves to something that all respectable Editors do, which is EDITING?

I don't understand... the rights to our reviews belong to them, right? So, since they have the right, they can also have the right not to publish them...

But why don’t the Editors just refuse to publish those that are too poor or too non-compliant? So they can leave the site to us "giants"? ;)

Thank you for roaming through my Rundgren reviews: yes, I admit it... I've changed my mind... it’s just that it’s a very complicated album and I hadn't listened to it as many times as it requires.

I quote blackdog