woodstock

What the hell is this stuff? Do you think this is a review? Okay, the single, so it’s shorter, but there was no need to come to Debaser just to translate the lyrics with ellipses.

what a drag, always the same records, did they only make those? and anyway, I agree with the majority: review trashed in the group.

oops

sanjuro you don't understand a damn thing about music

my goodness what a review...

I fully agree with senior86. As for me, just reviewing "una tribù che balla" was enough to stir up a mini uproar like this, even if the hurricane is yet to come...
PS I'm 18, and I think you don't need to be 60 to understand music.

Let me clarify one thing: I listen to EVERYTHING, from De André to Led Zeppelin, from the Rolling Stones to the Beatles, from Jovanotti to Battisti to Battiato to AC/DC to Queen to The Police to Bob Marley and then some more. But I think that precisely because Debaser seems to me a serious site where those who go there are serious people who at least understand music, it doesn't seem intelligent to say "sh*t" as soon as an Italian name is mentioned "from '85 onwards," as realAXL says. And if I said I have all the Simply Red albums (even though the last ones suck), would I be covered in sh*t? I bet more than half have only listened to the songs from the 4-5 years of those above... I've never listened to all the bands that realAXL talks about (maybe only the early REM) but of course I wouldn’t start throwing sh*t on all those I don't know, regardless!

I really don’t understand this hatred for our music from the 90s onwards, towards all genres. The fact that Pausini and Nek could be doing something else is not up for debate, but criticizing them a priori doesn’t seem fair to me. Have you at least listened to the album? Are you aware that this has NOTHING less compared to so many current ones? Or do you think that only English and American bands are the best, no matter what crap they put out?

Certo! Inviami il testo e procederò con la traduzione.

For j cavalli: I don’t believe that the good rolling stones, as far as their instrument technique is concerned, have anything to envy from other contemporary bands. Of course, they didn't have Jimi Hendrix, but Richards is a GREAT guitarist, especially considering the consistency in his work; Bill Wyman is definitely a great bassist, and Watts is just as good. Anyway, I believe that being able to play an instrument well is a relative matter in music.