Lord

Gabriel was the singer of Genesis, and outside of Genesis he was just a honest singer, doing his job and bringing home the bacon, that's all, he's neither a god nor does he boast a discography superior to that of Genesis (it's time to resize the phenomenon of Peter Gabriel, synthetic Pop sometimes good, sometimes not, like that of Genesis from those years), indeed, Peter Gabriel III, if I may say so, is inferior to Duke, which is from the same year (in terms of musicality, ideas, fluidity, and unity). Moreover, as someone rightly stated not too long ago in a review, Peter Gabriel, outside of Genesis, takes on the typical American model of singer-songwriter, nothing extraordinary, therefore. I believe that his debut album is the best, the most genuine; that's where Gabriel does whatever he wants, there’s Blues, a Rumba, Rock, Folk, symphonic ideas here and there, and there's even room for a masterpiece "Here comes the flood."

Already read, all nonsense, it’s like saying that in the beads of my room you can see the face of Padre Pio. If you stare at all the knots in the wood, it’s obvious you see something. Once, while I was masturbating on the bed, I saw in those marks the body of Fenech. The fact that I see all these figures in the knots of the wood doesn’t mean they really exist. Saying things like this about the movies of Bud and Terence seems frankly a bit of a bullshit to me. Rather, they are films with an underlying thought that is friendship and brotherhood in all their manifestations.

It's not Trash, it's a genre of its own, Bud and Terence, it's their genre, no one has ever made films like these. They are films that you keep coming back to because they have the flavor of simplicity, and because afterwards you feel good, serene, and go to bed happy: for all of this a 5, but it's not a five from Kubrick or Fellini, it's a 5 of normality, of the simplicity that the film conveys (like all the films of the duo).

Pathetic? Is that all you have to say to me?

Riccardo, I’m going to ask you again the question I posed some time ago. Are we at the end of the line?

Riccardo? He's trying to create a debate that, as usual, will never happen. In my opinion, he needs to change his approach; what he's doing now never works, nobody cares (except for me and you).

4 for the review, because the last sentence is totally wrong. The album is yet another masterpiece by Genesis, who, despite being diminished, managed to maintain excellent levels until 1980. Even if the album is not my favorite by Genesis, it definitely deserves a 5. Phil Collins on this record is already five years ahead; just listen and believe.

The fool has arrived too, I hadn't seen him.

The review is well written, so 5 (I was thinking of giving you 4 since reviews for this album are endless). The album is one of the absolute masterpieces of the Beatles and the absolute pinnacle of pop music (understood as a musical genre), despite all the nonsense that is said about the technical limitations of the four; there isn't a single mistake or a note out of place. An ESSENTIAL album.

Absolutely, at the age of 63, he has the voice of a twenty-year-old.