cptgaio

I would suggest that if you really have to post recipes, you include some of your own (or personalized) ones instead of copy-pasting from "Buonissimo," "Mondodelgusto," "Ricetteonline," etc. It would all be much more interesting! :-D

Maybe too pretentious: he has done better.

@Gustavo: Yeah! ;-) @Nes: I didn't quite understand the last sentence ;-)

@Vrtx: A two-part speech, the first part brief A) It doesn't seem to me that I have responded poorly to your "provocations" so far; I simply chose my path: I ignored them (which seems like a sign of lightness, doesn't it?). To this, I have decided to reply (but in an assertive manner) to clarify the discourse. The second part, longer: B) Perhaps I expressed myself poorly: it's not a question of "apologizing"; it was a way to say that in the future I will no longer respond to any of your provocations since, as you said, they are not premeditated and in bad faith but come to you spontaneously. You see, perhaps something that feels "a little" spontaneous to me is burdensome for you. On the other hand, I could say the same about you when I see you fiercely defending (too much?) certain musical or political dogmas that, from my perspective, didn't hold much meaning back when they originated, let alone now (I should mention: I'm not that young, and this idea comes from in-depth studies and not from mere surface observations or hearsay. If you say it's your right because you are objectively right, that's your business, and it's fine that way). But I don't do this because, apart from the fact that everyone is free to use (within the limits of legality and common sense) the internet as they see fit, I honestly find certain stances so vacuous, and often loudly echoed even here in the real world, that they don't deserve further exploration from me (in other cases that interest me, I do delve deeper, but it's not like we have many topics in common, don't you think?). On the other hand, I don't understand the reason for throwing barbs (sometimes quite heavy ones, let me say) if my "rationalist ethics" sends you running away ;-)
That said, I return the greeting. Bye.

Certo, invia pure il testo e procederò con la traduzione.

If you say they are not "premeditated," I have no reason not to believe you, so peace (forgive me if in the future I often won't respond to any others, I mean in a provocative tone). About the "misunderstanding" issue, what can I say? I find it sad that people often don't understand each other, but I would find it very serious if everyone "understood" everyone else: as a good rationalist, I think it would be the end of humanity. Take care.

I didn't mean this. I don't think you lack an open mind (at most, you and I see the world in diametrically opposed ways, but I can't say who is right or wrong), I think that for the past three months, whenever you can (not too often, but every time you have the chance) you’ve thrown me little "provocations" (maybe I misinterpreted your comments, but I don’t think so; however, to get to the point, if you want, I can share the links and the number of comments so we can clarify). The last one was in post 12 of this review. Now, since it doesn't seem to me that we've ever had reasons for conflict, I can't explain this, but I thought it would be right to point it out to you in a way (at least as I see it) polite. Best regards.

What could those poor Manowar have ever done to you? ;-) Thanks for stopping by. Bye.

Ps: of course it's a joke (lest the emoticon be not enough... you never know).

Think Vrtx, even you ;-)