cptgaio

I don't know what that B) is doing there at the end anyway...

Alright, the festival of clichés (and let me tell you, I have a true passion for clichés), just to clarify:
A) Blasphemy is not offensive because it is blasphemous but because it is aesthetically ugly and unpleasant.
B) It’s easy to talk about tolerance when only someone else's sensibility is at stake and not your own.
C) It’s been proven that not blaspheming is easier than doing it, so if someone asks you not to, it is a sign of civility to try to accommodate these sensitive brothers of ours on this topic.
D) This record is honestly bad and contains at least insipid content.
E) And it’s humor of truly low quality.
That said, I hope that the anonymous commenter who signs off as "blasphemies are funny" never finds themselves in a position to need the classic sign from above (and I assure you that even an atheist like me might eventually need to hope for something greater), because it would be embarrassing for their conscience.

Alright, I get it, but then it would have been fine with, I don't know, even Renal Colic ;-)

It's the only album of theirs that I like, a review a bit too brief.

Beautiful album and beautiful review.

You write very well, but I don't understand if your attitude (especially in the posts) is genuine or mocking, so I will reserve my judgment for later in your other reviews when I get to know you a bit better. Best regards ;-)

Indeed, Isis, the works I mention are all after '80 ;-)

In my opinion, they are neither new-wave nor pop, but I wouldn’t know how to define them either. And why does everything have to be labeled? That said, the review is well-written, but it’s clear you don’t know them well. Anyway, with time, you can only improve. The album is very nice, but it’s not the one I prefer of theirs.

or "Buybuymynewrecord"...

I also wanted to create a fake account, but I'm torn between "Brucedickinsonisgod" and "Quickestgirlinthefryingpan." What do you recommend?