cptgaio

I promise you that on May 29 I’ll tell you where the answer is (it’s there, it’s there...);-)
Anyway, I have to say that I’ve been coming back since your post 79 so as not to leave you alone (I’m afraid you might do something silly...).
See you tomorrow.

(my grandmother always told me that at ninety she still ate boiled beef)

The Law is harsh, but it is the Law.

Here he who seeks finds...

I assure you it’s all good, trust me ;-). You don't need to copy and paste what you write (I read your posts) and not even what I write (because I’m aware of it, unlike someone here :-D). We'll talk tomorrow because I have things to do today (no Giro today, rest day for them) so we have plenty of time until the 29th for us...

Mmm, in the meantime, I recommend you stay calm because you've been a bit nervous for about ten posts now. I keep coming back because the great thing about you is that I don’t have to do much: you make yourself ridiculous all on your own. Post 79 is one of the most hilarious (involuntary, obviously) posts in the history of this site. P.S. I don’t copy and paste anything (I know how to argue), I just tell you that it’s there, figure it out (besides, even if you find it, let's see if you can actually understand it: Rugby and Hockey Pista are already more than eloquent proof...). Regards. P.S.2: Look, I will waste (but maybe not, given your reaction, I am more and more convinced I’m in the “right”) time watching the Giro, but I can’t even imagine how you spend your afternoons (actually, I really don’t want to know) considering the subject... Now take all the time you want to respond, don’t worry, I’ll wait (unless you get high blood pressure). Regards. ---this post was written in three minutes and 32 seconds---

It wasn't a joke. You see, you don't understand anything of what is being said to you. Ps: I answered you, I answered you (go reread... or rather, read, my posts: one suggestion is one of my first interventions... so count on that...). You see, you don't understand anything 2 Ps2: Roller Hockey not Field Hockey. You see, you don't understand anything 3 (but here I give you the excuse that you might want to communicate something that, at the moment, I don't know). However, at this point I've gotten a taste for it and if you want we can go on endlessly at least until May 29 (since with the Giro d'Italia I have all my afternoons scheduled at home) then enough, because I'm going on my honeymoon. Take care.

Sorry. I have better things to do. Get some help from a psychologist or, alternatively, take up decoupage.

The only thing one can understand from your last 3 posts is that you are in "desperation" to get yourself out of the hole you've dug. Not even in the face of evidence. Delusional and hopeless. Best regards.

Bartleboom still has the gift of synthesis and in just under two lines explained the essence of the controversy... @Nes: "I'm not changing the boundaries of the discussion, I asked you a question and you keep not answering..." Calm and cold-blooded: A) No, I've already answered you and elaborated too much, at least in the first posts, then since one of us is either not reading or not understanding the other’s posts (and it’s not me: the circle is narrowing) I started to mess around B) Make up your mind: either you're messing with me or you want a serious discussion, because there have been at least three or four (and I haven’t counted them: but more or less since you realized you had no arguments, if you ever had any) posts where you prattle on about how I’m being made fun of (and how do you expect a response to your "questions" in this case?) C) As you can see, I just demonstrated that you shift the boundaries of the conversation or that you simply don’t even know what you’re rambling about (the result is the same anyway). I won’t send you best regards because they annoy you.