cptgaio

I wait.

Let's say that BBB really liked BIG. I liked them a bit less... that's all ;-)

Oh yes...All things are common!

I think that this film can be enjoyed for its aesthetic experience alone, without having to delve too deeply into the plot. Thank you for stopping by.

With BBB, I shared a passion for big boobs... A memorable film in its own way.

P.S: honestly, I find Elio's quotes out of place as well since the song you mentioned referred to a completely different topic...

Well, the review of Kid A remains the most credible: you criticize the intentions and consequences without ever getting to the heart of a serious analysis of the musical content, limiting yourself to preconceived notions about the listeners of the genre, and so your bitterness comes through without any substantive argumentation. What can I say about the album? It definitely belongs to that world that is much more commercial than musical (with all the related consequences), but amidst many questionable things, honestly, it’s not that bad: of course, I wouldn’t spend even a euro to buy it (a mistake you made even though you had already listened to it), and I don't even care to download it for free, but at least its singles didn’t force me to change the station every time they played on the radio (which happens very frequently with other stuff in this genre).

The underlying problem is that this review has been categorized as one of the "literary cases," meaning the place where anomalies (whether good or bad) end up, so it’s in its rightful spot (even if, in HP, I remember, far more questionable reviews have ended up there over the years, but I understand Bartle's explanation that DeB has changed and so has the editorial line). Therefore, the controversies seem frankly pointless to me unless one decides to remove this section (the cases, precisely) and thus directly dispose of all anomalies. But as long as it exists, I don’t see why we should unleash this "ideological" uproar over a piece of writing that, like any other in DeB, can be judged positively or negatively with ratings (especially since the reviewer didn't complain but only requested a correction regarding the formatting, for which, by the way, he took responsibility for the error: comment 3). My feeling is that there is an attempt to frame DeB within limits that are not natural for it (and, for example, the other, for me, pointless controversy over duplicates points in this direction). While I understand the Editors, who bear a huge workload, when they point out the violation of rules (even if I don’t understand why these aren’t applied rigorously by not publishing duplicates or, in this case, those formatted incorrectly), I understand less the outbursts of other users since DeB, by its very nature, allows for the existence of various anomalies (including the creation of more than one account: it’s up to everyone’s free will whether to use it as an alternative public persona or as a more or less annoying fake). I would resolve this with "much ado about nothing," but obviously, my opinion, like yours, is personal, so I won’t add anything further.

Certo, invia pure il testo e procederò con la traduzione.

Dick is among the most "adapted" authors, and paradoxically, I think he is one of the most difficult to adapt (in fact, often certain films are quite debatable). Among all his works, this is one that I loved the least, but I must say (it must be due to the post-production you mention) that I really enjoyed this film (and on top of that, there's that great man named Robert D.Jr.).