cptgaio

I vote for the hot chick (Y)(Y)(Y)(y) (Tiny thong=1/2 vote)

I vote for the hot chick (Y)(Y)(Y)

I liked it.

Wonderful.

Certo, invia pure il testo e procederò con la traduzione.

HB, I think you're making it a bit too complicated ;-) Jokes aside, I can't imagine someone "organizing" a compilation and intentionally boycotting some colleagues; sure, they might call their "friends," but it ends there. It's obvious that everyone tends to look out for their own interests, and you can't really make a CD with 150 bands. They called 20 (plus themselves) realities; the reasons are their own, but I'm interested in the result, which I personally find more than decent. Bye :-D

Here I messed up here... but it doesn’t affect the average. It’s the first one that counts ;-)

Moving on to the film, I must first make some fundamental considerations about the director: I see negative comments about Snyder, and I must say I find them quite unfair because, regardless of whether you like "300" or not (for example, I didn’t mind it at all as an aesthetic experience; of course, the story is what it is, but one could blame Miller for that), it must be acknowledged that he has a tremendous merit, which is that it is probably the most faithful cinematic adaptation (along with "Sin City") of a comic book ever. Furthermore, Snyder is far from inadequate when it comes to recreating certain "comic-like" settings on celluloid. If we talk about this particular film, I must say that the final impression is necessarily positive, first of all because, while it’s true that there had to be cuts (on supporting characters, on certain interpretations of metafiction, on the story within the story represented by "I Racconti del Vascello Nero," etc., etc.), these were inevitable to condense something potentially unimaginable into two and a half cinematic hours. That said, the underlying atmospheres, certain characterizations, and the use of flashbacks are done quite faithfully, and even the much-criticized ending, while different, doesn’t fundamentally distort the meaning. If I then consider the film independently from the comic, I must say that from a visual standpoint, I was pleasantly impressed. It would be a 3, but I’m giving it a 4 because there are also some gems that I think will remain in memory for a long time: one of them is the wonderful opening credits. I apologize for the spam and verbosity and greet everyone. Bye.

Well, having watched it tonight, I can pass on my comments: I'll do a bit of spam and post this comment on all 4 reviews because the reviews I had read when they first appeared on HP all appealed to me because (and this is a rare occurrence) they expressed more or less the same overall judgment on the film but arrived at it through different paths, each according to the different sensitivity of the reviewer, and this shows, besides critical sense, also considerable objectivity on everyone’s part: well done! That said, I have to say that there is one in particular that I liked more from a "style" perspective (and I won't tell you which one it is, not even under torture...) but since it was not easy at all to review this film (due to the legacy of the comic and the expectations), I think you all showed courage and deserve the highest praise: therefore, I don't care if I come across as a sycophant, but I give the highest rating to everyone. [continues]

Moving on to the film, I must first make some fundamental considerations about the director: I see negative comments about Snyder, and I must say I find them quite unfair because, regardless of whether you like "300" or not (for example, I didn’t mind it at all as an aesthetic experience; of course, the story is what it is, but one could blame Miller for that), it must be acknowledged that he has a tremendous merit, which is that it is probably the most faithful cinematic adaptation (along with "Sin City") of a comic book ever. Furthermore, Snyder is far from inadequate when it comes to recreating certain "comic-like" settings on celluloid. If we talk about this particular film, I must say that the final impression is necessarily positive, first of all because, while it’s true that there had to be cuts (on supporting characters, on certain interpretations of metafiction, on the story within the story represented by "I Racconti del Vascello Nero," etc., etc.), these were inevitable to condense something potentially unimaginable into two and a half cinematic hours. That said, the underlying atmospheres, certain characterizations, and the use of flashbacks are done quite faithfully, and even the much-criticized ending, while different, doesn’t fundamentally distort the meaning. If I then consider the film independently from the comic, I must say that from a visual standpoint, I was pleasantly impressed. It would be a 3, but I’m giving it a 4 because there are also some gems that I think will remain in memory for a long time: one of them is the wonderful opening credits. I apologize for the spam and verbosity and greet everyone. Bye.