cptgaio

Up, up, up... it was clear from the start and there was only one interpretation, and you understood it perfectly... nobody here is fooled! (is that how you write it?)

With that nickname, it’s nice to be taken for a .... ;-) I love you, whoever you are (and I say this without irony... take that rhyme!)

Two decades later, this is likely still their only true masterpiece: even above the first three.

@Senmayan: I repeat, the fact that you didn't like it confirms that I'm on the right track. I had already said it since post 74, you're the one who wanted to delve into the reasons. Good night.

PPS: "Challenge yourself against knowledgeable contexts and not with a group of people who simply and rightfully want to discuss music or movie reviews." As if the average DeB user only wants to talk about music and cinema and/or is incapable of tackling more "serious" subjects, that's something you only believe...

Feel free to think that I am biased, misinformed, incorrect, or whatever you like; I don’t care. I repeat, I have no intention of engaging in a discussion with you on these topics or others for the reasons I’ve already explained. One of these reasons is that I’ve already said enough on the subject you want to address (and here too, if you think I haven’t proven anything or that the journalist you cite has been “debunked,” that’s your problem, and I have no intention of changing your mind). You are right about one thing: you are talking air with me because it has exactly the same substance that I assign to your comments, and you are free to think the same of mine and of me: it certainly doesn’t change my life. Regards.
P.S.: On DeBaser, we don't only talk about what you mention: it has always allowed off-topic discussions (take a look around the site...) and this is definitely not the first "political" review (which, in reality, is just a pretext to talk about something else, but I see you haven’t understood that...). Choosing whether to interact with someone or not is the user's right (and part of democracy in general). You commented on one of my reviews, and I thought it was fair to give you a response. I’ve given you three responses, and now you will excuse me if I don’t reply anymore, right? Thank you.

Nice review, I don't know them well enough to give an opinion.

@Jurix: Captain Gaio: never seen "The Exorcist"? ;-)

was "logically and scientifically absurd": slip…

Let’s put it this way, Senmayan: I fear that your embrace of positions that are logically and scientifically illogical regarding September 11 is quite objective, but if it pleases you to believe otherwise, feel free. However, the fact that you come to criticize my stance on something entirely different, based on the same faulty logic, makes it clear to me that you probably tend to confuse things and have a predisposition towards "malafede," so I prefer to point out that a debate with you does not interest me. Therefore, think whatever you like about me: that I am "pro-imperialist" and "pro-American" or whatever suits you. I know very well what type of thinking you belong to, and I understand that this makes you inflexible even in the face of evidence, so any form of discussion would be quite pointless (as has already been demonstrated, even here on DeBaser). So it’s fine like this. I hope I have been clearer: sincerity or opinions have nothing to do with this case.