cptgaio

"FRENK | Rating: — | Album Rating: —
I always get responses without arguments, except from a few users." In fact, they (we) have given you plenty of arguments, while yours are rather weak...

I don't want to comment on your latest post, which I don't agree with, but that's your business if you believe certain lies. I just wanted to clarify one thing. A conspiracy theorist is not at all someone who "organizes a conspiracy" (there's a lovely noun for that: "conspirator"), but rather someone who, by their mindset, attributes any cause of an event (generally or specifically) to a conspiracy. This is Italian language, not an opinion. So, you are definitely not a conspirator, but certainly a conspiracy theorist. Clear?

And now enough for real. Night.

I know your ideas very well because you fit into the type of passionate "conspiracy theorist." Don't worry, no "dark plot," just intuition (and I think it's right) as we say in my place, "you’re all tied together by a string," and this "discussion confirms it: you use the same old rhetorical tricks believing that everyone reading you is a fool, and you don't realize you’re contradicting yourselves. When you can't get your way, you resort to that vile tactic of alluding to Nazism, anti-democracy, etc., etc. You are the first to make it personal, but when someone retaliates, you act all offended and bring up others’ "uncivilized" behavior. You believe you're different, but you’re just uniformed: all the same. The funny thing is that one can't even provoke you a little without you immediately pulling out your conspiratorial nature ("someone is following me everywhere and monitoring me"). If you weren't pathetic, you would be quite amusing. And forget about the argument that you don't read my posts right away—that doesn't hold water... I repeat, "nobody here is a fool."

"Only now" Now it's clear you don't read my posts (did you read the writing before giving your opinion and judgment?) Yes, yes, go ahead... Good night again! Thanks for the laughs!
P.S. I don't accept a comparison? Not with you for sure. You have nothing to compare with me.

"It really feels like the Gestapo method to me." I'd tread carefully when hinting at those things with me, young man, because today is not the day, and you truly know nothing of my ideas. I am perfectly aware of yours...and there would be plenty to say...

But do you really think I used your own words (obtuse and bad faith) by chance (Post 92)? It's obvious I remembered them. Wake up! Revenge? It was you who intervened in an inappropriate and heavily allusive way (Post 71). If it were up to me, I wouldn’t have paid any attention to you on the site again... for what you’re worth. By the way, I had even warned you (Post 77, that is, almost immediately) that I had my reasons... You’re the one who insisted on your (caricature-like) positions. I simply responded in kind each time until you flipped the script a bit too much for my taste. Good night.

I have shown you where my "consideration" for you comes from. You wanted to move the goalposts and "play dirty" by accusing me of things that usually belong only to your "repertoire" and certainly not mine. Now your justification is truly pathetic (ah, now you're ready to say you made a mistake, huh! After months...what a strange coincidence...) and it further demonstrates your lack of depth and your tendency to be "democratic" and "available" only when it concerns you... I am not interested in discussing the topic of that conversation any further, but know that I still think all those things and ( alas) they are completely objective (the story about "black on white" is ridiculous: as if I hadn't provided the sources myself... and more credible than yours) and if you consider them unfairness (when ever?) the problem is solely yours. Were we discussing "air" here? Of course, didn't I inform you that the discussion was useless from my point of view? Of course I did... but did I not tell you that my impressions of you were based on "real" things from the past, yes or no? Of course I did again...
At my house, we call that hypocrisy but I don't even have the desire to waste other terms for users like you. Moreover, now I should admit that I was wrong to treat you with the same coin... but don’t make me laugh.

From what pulpit are the personal judgments coming eh ;-)

Here it is: "The objective evidence is there, if you don't want to see it that's your problem, I don't know why and I don't care to know, either you're dull or acting in bad faith (I hope for you it's the second) but it's clear that you haven't seen Mazzucco's film.
senmayan | 1/22/2009 | 1:21 PM"
Massimo Mazzucco: September 11, 2001: Global Deception written by dark schneider