josi_

1) Very well, we eagerly await the next ones! 2) You say you know the History of Music, knowing 40-50 bands. I repeat: I have the impression that you know the History of Music Sales, not that of Music. 3) If the greats are MJ and Madonna, there's no need to go to community centers to find those who criticize them. Anyway, "those who belittle the greats while promoting the unknown are community center types" is a stereotype as big as a house; can you even tell me, I don’t know, what their zodiac sign is? 4) In fact, if you know 40-50 bands, it’s no surprise that you really think MJ is the greatest artist of all time. 5) You can like We Are The World as much as you want, but the arguments you use to define it as the best song ever are ridiculous: you’re the one trying to impose the History of Music based on TV audience ratings. 6) Forget it, Dvorak is a friend of mine who records songs with 40 tracks. 7) You’ve said a thousand times that rock in the '80s has no historical value, come on, be ashamed of that nonsense and just stop. Unless by "historical value" you mean, once again, commercial success. 8) Quoting Carlo Verdone to further your own agenda when talking about music is the ridiculous concept... wow, do I really have to explain everything to you! // Not going to respond to (9) and (10)? :D Oh, one more thing, where did you read that I’m rock-centric? "Rock" in the strict sense is one of the genres I like the least...

Right, we're at 10. Now the real gem would be a review of Bowie, after which we can have some serious fun :)

Oh damn, speaking of History, I almost forgot the most beautiful of all: (9) World War II can be summed up with Churchill, Pearl Harbor, and Hitler. Come on, one more and we’ll get to the Decalogo di Wlaterstarman, a gift with the next issue of TV Sorrisi&Canzoni exclusively for fan club members.

Yes radiozaza, but then when someone pointed it out to him he "explained" that by 4-5 he meant a low number but not 4-5 literally; let's pretend to believe him and imagine he knows 40-50, come on. Still very few to have the History of Music in their pocket... apart from what can be found attached to TV Sorrisi&Canzoni, of course!

Oh yes, I almost forgot: (7) The evolution of music can be summed up like this: rock in the '70s, glitter in the '80s, Britpop in the '90s, and Britney Spears in the 2000s (8) Carlo Verdone is a renowned music critic.

Let's recap. (1) Review only Queen (2) You know, if you want to make a generous estimate, 40-50 bands (3) Anyone who listens to unknown bands is a loser from a community center (4) MJ is the greatest musical artist of all time - because he sold more than anyone (5) We Are The World is the most important song ever - because it was watched on TV by millions of people (6) Schnittke, Dvorak, Part, and Autechre make rock (and they're idiots). Did I miss anything else? :D Counter, I think there's enough here to put it at number 1.

Yes, Veterans Of Disorder makes me feel very zamatauro (I like it), I couldn’t catch Twin Infinitves, and this one neither. I confirm the current Jennifer is a bit of a pathetic rock cat...

Ah ah, do you think Schnittke, Dvorak, Part, and Autechre are four idiots of rock? :D Considering that we’re talking about classical music in the case of the first three and IDM in the case of Autechre... what can I say, you really master the History of Music! But isn’t there a section on TV Sorrisi & Canzoni called “how to avoid embarrassing moments at 13”?

But I don’t deny that you are very knowledgeable in the History of Music Sales, a professor in the History of Hits and an honorary degree in the History of Pop Stars! Who could deny it? We acknowledge it! :D

Aaaaahhh well, here’s your authoritative music culture! The King of Pop! And Madonna the Queen of Pop?! Or Jennifer Lopez? Or the little Australian Kylie Minogue? Are you perhaps the reincarnation of Antonio Luca? :D