josi_

When someone has class, they have class.

How was school today, Walter?

I love everything about this page, from JoP to Bach, from individual terms like "s'inglicina" to the broad concepts of the closing. Recommended.

Sure, but in general, "in music" as you said, there are objective things, of course. Sure, the Blues suck, but it’s still all about sound waves. Hi pix, have a good weekend!

Big words, pix. Would you say that the Blues are better than Mozart? There are, there are absolute truths, even in this field.

Ouch ouch pixelid, you’ve been caught! You really said that! …Anyway, come on, if over the course of 5 months you’ve had the chance to change your mind, that deserves acknowledgment. Good job. Walterstarman would rather cut off his mustache than change his mind.

Uff, I knew it, I have to paste it for the fourth time. What a drag you are, though, Walter, you're a little rascal. <<But who talked about technique? I don’t care about technique. What interests me is the musical value (we’ve written this term a thousand times! I wrote "bravura" for brevity, but it seemed obvious...), which is a combination of various things, certainly difficult to theorize: surely originality is part of it and SURELY the "scene" or sales success are NOT part of it. Then, regarding the purpose of making music (art/money), I think both I and ajeje (that pixelid) have clarified the concept: one thing is writing music trying to make it "sellable," another is writing it simply following your inspiration (and if it succeeds, nothing wrong with that, indeed). This is the concept, if you want to beat around the bush again, do it with the little rat you have in your head.>>

Ah ah ah! And they stuck in the figs.

And I've only seen 6. I had conjunctivitis.

Years? They wanted to give Jim 10, with parole condizionali.