Logic Probe

And finally, you are so convinced: "try doing these things in Islamic countries and if you're lucky, they'll throw you in a cell for 20 years with nothing but bread and water." On the contrary, Islamic hospitality is famous. But have you ever been to Arab countries? You speak of it as though you have deep knowledge... but have you ever physically been there? Or is it a deductive thought? If you have any evidence, I would appreciate you linking it to me... otherwise, this discussion should be considered closed and exhausted. With affection.

Another incorrect statement is about referendums. I did not talk about my alignment, as can be clearly read from my post (just read it for what it is without interpreting). I do not criticize those who have positions that are virtually different from mine, but rather those who let themselves be influenced by the opinions of others, hence, if you vote no, that's fine, express your opinion. But many people have been influenced by Catholic thought rather than forming their own ideas. In this situation, don't you think we have lost democracy and enlightenment in general? Why do you feel personally involved when my only point of disagreement with you is well expressed? If you want a fight from me, I assure you that you won't get it. I find your responses to be digressions that are not constructive and easily deduced. Try to read seriously what I am writing to you and do not interpret my thoughts in your own way. Ciauz

No, it’s you who misunderstand, and it seems evident to me. You start by talking about subcultures (you said it!) and then you position yourself as someone open to dialogue with others? To me, there seems to be an incongruity. Or maybe you enjoy shooting the arrow, and once it’s fired, you dress yourself in respectability? My friend, I’m not joking. I didn’t talk about a lack of Western tolerance but about Western Taliban. Do you understand the difference? A Western Taliban is someone who shoots judgments based on prejudices…someone who easily points the finger at others, who believes they are superior and, in this light, diminishes the other. You do not criticize Islam, but the dogmatic practitioner of faith and the warmonger. I want to clarify that this is not Islamic culture (the Quran does not prescribe, although you would like it to be different, holy war, but only war as defense) and that there is an equivalence in the West. Terrorism is elsewhere. Let’s not confuse things and let’s not fall into easy comparisons and judgments made by those who are, in reality, far from those places. I criticize your underlying violent thought, that veiled violence that conceals a statement asserting that what is not in my way of being is a subculture. Like it or not, you have asserted this. This is violence. Now, mock me as you please if it makes you feel better, but be careful with your words; from them, hatred can be generated. Don’t you think there’s already too much of it?

Euclid the geometer and Ptolemy,
Hippocrates, Avicenna, and Galen,
Averroes, who made the great commentary.
(Divine Comedy, Inferno, IV, 142-144)
To the anonymous: I quote Dante in response to your obvious ignorance... in this passage, Dante cites two Arab philosophers, Averroes and Avicenna. I’m not saying this, but Dante is, and it is assumed that at least you have read Dante. Much of Western thought derives from these two Arabs whom you assert to be a subculture! Since you are educated, you will also know that many masters of the Arts were Latin followers of Averroes or at least were considered as such by their adversaries (Bonaventure, Albert the Great, Thomas Aquinas). I find absolutely nonsensical what you have written; I hope in a moment of profound hilarity! Perhaps we Westerners need to have a bit more humility. You talk about terrorists; certainly, I mean Arab culture. Not everything that seems different and unacceptable to us is truly so.

I really like this review. Absolutely lamented.

Precisely because the memory is faint, it would have been appropriate to delve into this album, the genre, what it can be referenced to, who the band members are... etc... etc. This is not a review; it’s a news piece! At least include some samples because from what you’ve written, nothing emerges. I'm sorry.

Damn, not only G_à, in the Renaissance putting the mad on ships meant "taking them to the thousand shores" of reason and not on a one-way trip. In other words, all directions (of the sea) can lead to some logical destination, therefore a journey towards reason. However, they are often identified with journeys of hope (read migration). Now 2+2 makes 4. Enkrist, but with this migration, you're really onto something! Even in the subconscious. And to think that the review isn't bad.

qui prodest? Or, what did you mean? That the mafia is an isolated phenomenon tied to the well-known and famously renowned cities that are better left unnamed, but are subtly assumed to be in the south? But look, the mafia has interests beyond what one can even imagine and it is not a phenomenon confined to a specific territorial district. I quote the excellent Hal.... there is no trace of the record, common places galore and absolutely simplistic interpretations of a problem that, on the contrary, is serious (and not relegated only to the south!!). In short, Enkrì, when you write music reviews, you do so well and they are appreciated, but when you step out and discuss social issues... damn... it sounds just like bus talk! Do as you wish!

The beauty, in my opinion, is that they are not capable of making Pop with a capital P. Collins never managed it either. Even in pop there can be experimentation and quality; pop also produces epoch-making records. For example, do you remember Rufus Wainwright's Want One and Want Two? I know Rufus comes 20 years after this album, but he still has to measure himself against the crude pop (poppe in the case of Spears) of the aforementioned singer. And do you know what the result is? A blend of opera, classical music, singer-songwriter traditions, and American folk... simply brilliant, and it's just Pop! The Genesis pop not only cannot be listened to in the name of the past, but they also can't even imagine an evolution of pop! It's seriously crazy. Personally, I've continued to follow Gabriel, even in his "softer" projects. Ciauz.

In fact, to close the golden era of Litfiba, we would only need a review of Litfiba 3. Desaparecido is an excellent album. Then, slowly, Litfiba loses "members" (Marok, Ringo De Palma) and only the brainless Pelù and Renzulli remain to contend for the nothingness produced in modern times (I don't know, try pairing "cuore di vetro" or "gira nel mio cerchio" with "bomba boomerang!!!!"). Today that legacy passes through other bands (try listening to Bachi da Pietra, OvO, Ronin, Wolfango). Finally, for the record, but correct me if I'm wrong, the first album by Litfiba is Eneide (truly fantastic and absolutely experimental for a rock band) followed by Desaparecido. Felt review but not very descriptive. Ciauz Logic.