Grasshopper

This is indeed a record... 1 on average! Shitty record and a review to match. There's nothing more to add: others have already done it all. For a normal person, that would be more than enough to leave Debaser for good. Forever, preferably.

Oops... I knew that 70% of your reviews were knockoffs of better ones, but I had forgotten that in one case (this one) I was the victim... How careless! This really deserves a 1.

Egebamyasi, don't be too surprised that our Marco Poletti hasn't gotten a single description right. It's normal for him, and he shouldn't be trying to engage with someone like De Andrè but at most with Baglioni. And indeed, there he does a little better.

A flat and gray little review, typically polettiana, for an album that definitely deserved much more. But I'm kinder than average and I feel sorry for this poor artichoke (also because an average of 1.40 speaks for itself. I rarely go below 4.50). So I’ll raise it with a generous 2.

By Richard Wagner (in Italian it's "L'olandese volante") The orchestra can be any existing orchestra: I recommend the classic Berliner Philharmoniker conducted by Karajan. Now, however, I'll stop responding because if I get too distracted my bosses will beat me up. Bye.

Are you taking an intensive course on Beethoven? I'm at work, and I throw this out there: it should be the Overture of Fidelio or one of the three "Leonore" (it seems that Beethoven had a real fixation on this name).

Long live great music (which is not just classical) and those who review it appropriately and with the right use of language. Screw those who think that doing this is snobbish and pretentious.

It means "in D minor Op. 125" Great choice: (it's Beethoven's Ninth... it doesn't get any better than this!)

It certainly won't be some fool going through my reviews, giving each one a 1 accompanied by insults, that will decrease my passion for classical music by even a gram or my desire to discuss it with those who understand me as best I can. Among other things, this isn't the first time some idiot has reviewed what I’ve written (without reading it, since they wouldn’t be capable of it) just to slap a 1 followed by nonsensical phrases. But at least the previous idiot was sincere and, in a way, had a certain self-awareness, to the point of signing as "bastardone." The one who conducted this latest raid seems even worse as a fool: not comical, but just bitter and irritable. A type like CharlieNOKIA, if you will, although it doesn’t necessarily mean it’s him. Well, whoever it is, know that I have 104 reviews under my belt (104 like Haydn's symphonies) and I have no intention of stopping.

For CharlieNOKIA, I have no words: if he still hasn't understood that "loggione" is a way of saying to indicate the small core of classic maniacs of Debaser, then there is no hope. I don't know where he might have found the arrogance: certainly not in the review. Perhaps traces of it can be found in the annoyance with which I commented on Satanic's first intervention, but Charlie probably hasn't read either the review or the comments: he sensed a confrontation and barged in here with a 2 and with gratuitous insults. Therefore, I can only adopt a very arrogant tone and ignore him as he deserves, unlike Satanic, with whom I was able to reason. Come on, don’t waste any more of my time: we intellectuals are caught up in far more important things than these chicken fights (and maybe some idiot will take me seriously...)