Luca-LJ

However, abroad there's not even one of "Terra mia"! Anyway, thanks for the information!

Listen, calm down for a moment and reread what I wrote: "I DON'T HAVE ANYTHING AGAINST DUPLICATES: think that I started on this site with an album that already had 4 reviews", "I WAS JUST CURIOUS to know how you managed to review all these albums in such a short time! Charley satisfied my curiosity, so now I have nothing more to say." The comment about the excessive number of reviews was not because it bothered me (it doesn't create any problem for me) but to make you understand that you are not in a position to get angry with people since any of us could legitimately complain given that you took up more space than any of us does with each review. If you still don't understand what I've said, I give up and leave you in peace. Sure, it doesn't make you look very good, though!

Alright, I'll say one last thing and then I’ll leave: if a single reviewer publishes 6 or 7 reviews all at once, isn't that a bit too much? It delays the publication of other reviews and reduces the visibility time of those that are already there (for example, mine on Dave Grusin might still be visible if Brizz hadn’t come up with this lovely idea). With this, I don’t want to stir up controversy or interrogate anyone! I don’t care, it’s fine as it is! I just want to make it clear to the reviewer that they can't afford to be difficult; it's really not the right time!

You didn't understand a damn thing of what I wrote to you, let's drop it.

For Vallespluga: that site you mentioned didn't seem very rigorous to me! It even says that Pino Daniele resembles Gianluca Grignani! I know it's unrelated to what we were talking about, but I had a lot of laughs randomly matching musicians' names! I invite everyone to give it a try!

Alright, keep calm! I have nothing against duplicates: just think, I started on this site with an album that already had 4 reviews! I was just curious to know how you managed to review all these albums in such a short time! Charley satisfied my curiosity, so now I have nothing more to say. Except that I think this band sucks and that your review doesn’t really blow me away (but it’s not that bad after all).

But I wasn't referring to the fact that there were already other reviews of this album; that's the least of it. I was referring to the fact that all the latest reviews that came out on Debaser were written by him! There's nothing wrong with that, you know! But I was wondering how he managed to do it! And why!

But how many damn reviews do you write?

I saw them live in Imola, they honestly make me feel SICK!

No. If it were just about the content, anyone could write true masterpieces! It would be enough to say: "I'm sad," "the cops are bastards," "I do drugs because I'm a loser," "my parents split up and now I cry like a baby," "fuck you and that whore of your mother." Unfortunately, form matters too; if you can't write, you can tackle the deepest themes out there (and it's not the case of "mondo marcio" anyway!), but it will always be crap (look at the latest by Nomadi! It talks about war but it's total rubbish because it's banal, childish, naive, predictable). Having clarified that a chimpanzee has much more style than "mondo marcio," let's also convince ourselves that these topics are shockingly banal: "street life," "drugs," "urban jungle," "alienation in the big metropolis," "loss of reference points," come on! This is my last participation in the discussion. I don't want to hear any more about it; it's becoming really boring. You are free to pass this CRAP off as poetry, no problem! I was just trying to open your eyes to let you feel deeper sensations with more valid and refined musicians. My intent was philanthropic; if you don't care, that's fine! The important thing is that you are happy this way. It was just a suggestion from me. Go ahead and settle for less. I'm just sorry that that clumsy fool is making money without doing a damn thing, cursed!