fusillo

DeRank : 1,98
DeAge™ : 7367 days • Here since 9 april 2006
Ludwig van Beethoven The Late Piano Sonatas
Voto:
Dear Girasole, I assumed that if I write on a site for music lovers, I must like something and maybe I get stuck on it. Instead, I don’t like Miles. It seems to me, therefore, that my joke, while not exactly the joke of the century, still works. Thank you anyway for the clarification. Goodbye.
Ludwig van Beethoven The Late Piano Sonatas
Voto:
So... I think my uncle Miles' music sucks! Is Duanethereturn going to sleep tonight? I don't know, and who cares anyway...
Ludwig van Beethoven The Late Piano Sonatas
Voto:
Are you talking to me?
Ludwig van Beethoven The Late Piano Sonatas
Voto:
To me, Miles's music sucks. Will you sleep tonight?:-)
Paolo Sorrentino L'uomo in più
Voto:
Certo, inviami pure il testo e procederò con la traduzione.
AA.VV. Maiden Heaven, A Tribute to Iron Maiden
Voto:
tell me the truth cpt, you came back just because you're a creature of habit. :-)
Paola & Chiara Giornata Storica
Voto:
Hi Bartle. I agree with everything you said in the first post. On the other hand, I didn't participate in the discussion, as it seemed pointless; others had already said the things that mattered to me, and my post would have gotten lost in the chaos over war, terrorism, and various nonsense. I acknowledge the admission of error. If I had read it on the incriminating page, I wouldn’t have mentioned the issue... Anyway, I didn’t say that the site is going to hell or that the quality has dropped. I only say that certain attitudes should, in my opinion, be stopped in their tracks regardless. I know that your possible review of Manowar, praising wars between Vikings and Valkyries, would stir up quite a fuss. But since dust-ups happen around here with a certain frequency even over trivial matters, in the case of glaring, and I repeat in capital letters, GLARING AND GRAVELY provocative content, a polite, peaceful, fraternal censorship is not the worst of evils... In the case of Flinstone, however, I completely disagree. I "know" Flinstone, I know he is a competitive pain in the neck and that he doesn’t have all his screws in place. For this reason, the less attention you give him, the better. And specifically, by removing the editorial, you would achieve the not insignificant result of taking the gloom off the current home page... By the way, it’s been there for a few days... everyone understands that "Even Flinstone loves debaser". Are Nick and Enea on vacation? Good for them, in my opinion; anyway, between a disgusting editorial and no editorial, no editorial is preferable. Oh, let's be clear, this is a suggestion, of course. And I'll tell you: I don't think Flinstone has taken or will take your initiative as an attempt to ironically tone things down. Rather, it will give him the spark to keep stirring the pot. If there's one thing Flinstone has shown he lacks, it’s a sense of humor. Bye.
Paola & Chiara Giornata Storica
Voto:
Hi Bartle. I agree with everything you said in the first post. On the other hand, I didn't participate in the discussion, as it seemed pointless; others had already said the things that mattered to me, and my post would have gotten lost in the chaos over war, terrorism, and various nonsense. I acknowledge the admission of error. If I had read it on the incriminating page, I wouldn’t have mentioned the issue... Anyway, I didn’t say that the site is going to hell or that the quality has dropped. I only say that certain attitudes should, in my opinion, be stopped in their tracks regardless. I know that your possible review of Manowar, praising wars between Vikings and Valkyries, would stir up quite a fuss. But since dust-ups happen around here with a certain frequency even over trivial matters, in the case of glaring, and I repeat in capital letters, GLARING AND GRAVELY provocative content, a polite, peaceful, fraternal censorship is not the worst of evils... In the case of Flinstone, however, I completely disagree. I "know" Flinstone, I know he is a competitive pain in the neck and that he doesn’t have all his screws in place. For this reason, the less attention you give him, the better. And specifically, by removing the editorial, you would achieve the not insignificant result of taking the gloom off the current home page... By the way, it’s been there for a few days... everyone understands that "Even Flinstone loves debaser". Are Nick and Enea on vacation? Good for them, in my opinion; anyway, between a disgusting editorial and no editorial, no editorial is preferable. Oh, let's be clear, this is a suggestion, of course. And I'll tell you: I don't think Flinstone has taken or will take your initiative as an attempt to ironically tone things down. Rather, it will give him the spark to keep stirring the pot. If there's one thing Flinstone has shown he lacks, it’s a sense of humor. Bye.
Paola & Chiara Giornata Storica
Voto:
Hi Psycho, Well, I don't think it was so necessary to become aware of the hidden aspects of the "Flinstone Case"... In my opinion, the only effect of publishing his email is that now even the newest members know who old Fred is... Those of us who have been frequenting debaser for a while already knew him... Anyway, Happy Holidays!
Paola & Chiara Giornata Storica
Voto:
Hi Psycho, Well, I don't think it was so necessary to become aware of the hidden aspects of the "Flinstone Case"... In my opinion, the only effect of publishing his email is that now even the newest members know who old Fred is... Those of us who have been frequenting debaser for a while already knew him... Anyway, Happy Holidays!