Voto:
Dear Girasole, I assumed that if I write on a site for music lovers, I must like something and maybe I get stuck on it. Instead, I don’t like Miles. It seems to me, therefore, that my joke, while not exactly the joke of the century, still works. Thank you anyway for the clarification. Goodbye.
Voto:
So... I think my uncle Miles' music sucks! Is Duanethereturn going to sleep tonight? I don't know, and who cares anyway...
Voto:
Are you talking to me?
Voto:
To me, Miles's music sucks. Will you sleep tonight?:-)
Voto:
Certo, inviami pure il testo e procederò con la traduzione.
Voto:
tell me the truth cpt, you came back just because you're a creature of habit. :-)
Voto:
Hi Bartle. I agree with everything you said in the first post. On the other hand, I didn't participate in the discussion, as it seemed pointless; others had already said the things that mattered to me, and my post would have gotten lost in the chaos over war, terrorism, and various nonsense. I acknowledge the admission of error. If I had read it on the incriminating page, I wouldn’t have mentioned the issue... Anyway, I didn’t say that the site is going to hell or that the quality has dropped. I only say that certain attitudes should, in my opinion, be stopped in their tracks regardless. I know that your possible review of Manowar, praising wars between Vikings and Valkyries, would stir up quite a fuss. But since dust-ups happen around here with a certain frequency even over trivial matters, in the case of glaring, and I repeat in capital letters, GLARING AND GRAVELY provocative content, a polite, peaceful, fraternal censorship is not the worst of evils... In the case of Flinstone, however, I completely disagree. I "know" Flinstone, I know he is a competitive pain in the neck and that he doesn’t have all his screws in place. For this reason, the less attention you give him, the better. And specifically, by removing the editorial, you would achieve the not insignificant result of taking the gloom off the current home page... By the way, it’s been there for a few days... everyone understands that "Even Flinstone loves debaser". Are Nick and Enea on vacation? Good for them, in my opinion; anyway, between a disgusting editorial and no editorial, no editorial is preferable. Oh, let's be clear, this is a suggestion, of course. And I'll tell you: I don't think Flinstone has taken or will take your initiative as an attempt to ironically tone things down. Rather, it will give him the spark to keep stirring the pot. If there's one thing Flinstone has shown he lacks, it’s a sense of humor. Bye.
Voto:
Hi Bartle. I agree with everything you said in the first post. On the other hand, I didn't participate in the discussion, as it seemed pointless; others had already said the things that mattered to me, and my post would have gotten lost in the chaos over war, terrorism, and various nonsense. I acknowledge the admission of error. If I had read it on the incriminating page, I wouldn’t have mentioned the issue... Anyway, I didn’t say that the site is going to hell or that the quality has dropped. I only say that certain attitudes should, in my opinion, be stopped in their tracks regardless. I know that your possible review of Manowar, praising wars between Vikings and Valkyries, would stir up quite a fuss. But since dust-ups happen around here with a certain frequency even over trivial matters, in the case of glaring, and I repeat in capital letters, GLARING AND GRAVELY provocative content, a polite, peaceful, fraternal censorship is not the worst of evils... In the case of Flinstone, however, I completely disagree. I "know" Flinstone, I know he is a competitive pain in the neck and that he doesn’t have all his screws in place. For this reason, the less attention you give him, the better. And specifically, by removing the editorial, you would achieve the not insignificant result of taking the gloom off the current home page... By the way, it’s been there for a few days... everyone understands that "Even Flinstone loves debaser". Are Nick and Enea on vacation? Good for them, in my opinion; anyway, between a disgusting editorial and no editorial, no editorial is preferable. Oh, let's be clear, this is a suggestion, of course. And I'll tell you: I don't think Flinstone has taken or will take your initiative as an attempt to ironically tone things down. Rather, it will give him the spark to keep stirring the pot. If there's one thing Flinstone has shown he lacks, it’s a sense of humor. Bye.
Voto:
Hi Psycho, Well, I don't think it was so necessary to become aware of the hidden aspects of the "Flinstone Case"... In my opinion, the only effect of publishing his email is that now even the newest members know who old Fred is... Those of us who have been frequenting debaser for a while already knew him... Anyway, Happy Holidays!
Voto:
Hi Psycho, Well, I don't think it was so necessary to become aware of the hidden aspects of the "Flinstone Case"... In my opinion, the only effect of publishing his email is that now even the newest members know who old Fred is... Those of us who have been frequenting debaser for a while already knew him... Anyway, Happy Holidays!
Similar users
egebamyasi

DeRank: 0,42

Qzerty

DeRank: 0,71

gabbox

DeRank: 0,97

Hal

DeRank: 9,08

giorgioladisa

DeRank: -0,12

Mauri

DeRank: 0,06

ZiOn

DeRank: 19,19

sfascia carrozze

DeRank: 39,03

Socrates

DeRank: 2,30