Adriano Bernard

You still haven't been able to prove that the essence of their music is absent; on the contrary, it exists but is trivial, commercial, tacky, Americanized, melodic. I repeat: beneath the 40 minutes of false intellectual technicality, completely self-serving, beneath the lukewarm stew that has nothing to do with melody, THERE IS NOTHING. Doublezero.

9) These are all people who, unlike others, know in which direction their music is going and in which direction the fans' tastes are heading: in fact, they have released only 2 studio albums and a couple of live ones, knowing that this was a side project, which I find pleasant. I BELIEVE THAT, AFTER 2 ALBUMS WITH 10 SONGS OF 40 MINUTES EACH OF VIRTUOSITY, THEY HAD LOST THEIR IDEAS (NOT THAT THEY EVER HAD ANY...10). Finally, the positive Americanism from the right that you mentioned has nothing to do with it, which I find pleasant. IT HAS EVERYTHING TO DO WITH IT. I REPEAT, LISTEN TO TUNES LIKE "here i am" BY ADAMS or "drowning" BY THE BACKSTREET BOYS, ESPECIALLY THE FIRST ONE, I WANT TO SEE HOW YOU CAN DENY THE ABSOLUTE SIMILARITY OF BANALITY, BUZZWORDISM, AND LACK OF IDEAS. BECAUSE UNDER ALL THAT TECHNICALITY, IF WE GO TO ANALYZE THE NAKED AND RAW MELODY, IT'S UNDENIABLE THAT IT IS BANAL. PIBROCH ONE THING IS TASTES AND ANOTHER IS OBJECTIVITY.
Name: Adriano Bernard | Date: 20/10/2006 | Rating: | Album Rating: 1

6) The formula of the singer/keyboardist is spot on because a musician who writes and sings their own pieces always has an edge, which I find enjoyable. 7) It’s music that, unlike the blues or Britney Spears or whoever you want, needs to be assimilated in a certain way, not judged at first listen, ultimately resulting in a moment of brilliance to an ear that’s a bit more experienced and accustomed, which I find pleasant. I MEAN, ARE YOU TELLING ME THAT SINCE IT SEEMS LIKE CRAP AT FIRST LISTEN, IN THE END, IF YOU LISTEN TO IT 100 TIMES YOU’RE SO DENSE THAT YOU APPRECIATE IT?! 8) They have still managed to create a unique sound and an unmistakable style that I find pleasant. ON THE CONTRARY, THAT'S EXACTLY THE POINT: THEY ARE ANONYMOUS LIKE FEW. SAME DISCUSSION AS THE DT, EXCEPT IN THIS CASE, IT'S EVEN WORSE!!!

Ten good reasons why it’s worth killing the Transatlantic: 1) The melodies are well arranged and intertwine nicely, which I find pleasant OF COURSE THEY ARE WELL ARRANGED, THE PROBLEM I WOULD SAY IS THE MELODIES! 2) The vocals have been meticulously crafted and are, besides being well sung, also enjoyable to listen to, which I find pleasant CRAFTED POORLY CONSIDERING THEY’RE TRIVIAL 3) Listening carefully, you can catch an interaction between the melodic and rhythmic parts worthy of great bands like Genesis and King Crimson, which I find melodically pleasant YES SURE, I TOLD YOU THEY ARE JUST COPYING THEM OPENLY 4) It’s not the usual ultra-technical music like Dream Theater, but it aims at all other pillars, giving more importance to listening, which I find pleasant WHAT OTHER PILLARS, CAN YOU LIST THEM? IT’S WORSE THAN DT, DT ARE LESS COMMERCIAL AND LESS TRIVIAL (ALTHOUGH THEY ARE VERY MUCH TOO) 5) In an era like this when prog is considered a dead genre, Transatlantic has managed to reconcile the "dead genre" with modern music, which I find pleasant MODERN MUSIC WOULD BE COMMERCIAL CRAP LIKE THE BACKSTREET BOYS? DOWNLOAD DROWNING, TRUST ME..., D

It’s not about the fact that they aren’t famous: there are a lot of bands that no one knows who absolutely suck and would be perfect for climbing MTV playlists… not everyone can become famous even when making music that is meant for that. Bands like DT and Transatlantic lack ideas. They play perfectly, but beneath all those notes and well-played arrangements, there’s really nothing. Anyway, you can't tell me "everyone has their own opinion" because you voted 5 for this album and you can’t prove to me that what I’m saying isn’t true. Document your responses; a simple "de gustibus" isn’t enough here, because I might like Blue too, but from a musical standpoint, they suck, right?! We’re talking about you claiming this is good music, I told you I don’t think it is and I’ve listed the reasons. What I’m saying is wrong to you, right? So explain to me the reasons… HALOA

Yes, sorry, I always get confused with the name :)

Sorry, do you disagree with what I said above? Can you share your ideas and show me where I’m wrong? Let’s discuss it, right?! It doesn’t seem like you’re the type to listen to nonsense, usually. And anyway, it was in response to shooting...

The sacrament is you.

no comment, the vote speaks for itself.

I would say, for the degenerates, the same ones you assigned to nosound, maybe add the electro jazz genre. A little masterpiece.