Adriano Bernard

I don't mind, Ligabue is a clever one. And his career is zero art, crap from the first album to today, even worsening. The main problem, which makes him lucky, is that we Italians like these fake rockers with the vibe of poet-lover-worldly-wise guys like Springsteen, because we like the populist figure, there's not much to do about it. They play the role of our dad, "love matters"... He and Vasco know exactly where to strike, where to aim, and how to screw you: a bit like Silvio.

Shit.Shit.Shit. And he's an idiot.

The mystical crisis is still tearing me apart.

The mystical crisis is still tearing me apart.

Chinaski, are you Scaruffi's son? The vibe is just like his, and the records you refer to as "great works" are indeed his, along with the same way of doing things...

I would like to burn you naturally, but when I'm like this, you make me look like a fool. So I decide that for our own good, I will be annoyingly magnetic and intriguing. And now, yes, I am quite the fool, but you trust me because it doesn't show on the outside.

one, just because zero is absent.

You would agree with me that my response would always be more constructive than a "fuck off, you dickhead, you don't understand anything about music, hide away." Or not?

"So what should I say? That De André sucks because it's dance? How would you respond to me?" ----> I would tell you that on instinct I don't agree, but I would ask you to support your thesis with logical reasoning, motivations, and examples. The concept itself never says much; a thought process is needed.

Chinaski, frankly you continue with your usual behavior, and you might have addressed only one point from my previous post. Anyway, it’s clear that you haven’t understood at all what lux says about the arrangements: the difference is that “de andrè sucks because it's dance” is nonsense because it’s objectively false and self-serving, since de andrè is a singer-songwriter, not a dance artist. That the arrangements on this album are self-serving and thus close to those of Sanremo because they're merely triumphalist self-praise is an opinion, supported by a logical process and some theses that lux has put forward. That the mere thought of this opinion makes your ass itch clearly demonstrates that it’s much easier to spew out that he’s just talking bullshit and not even stop to reflect, because the accusation he makes is so enormous (there's nothing worse than Sanremo) that it destabilizes you. And to reclaim your ground, you don’t discuss; you insult. This is called insecurity. And that’s also why I’m even more convinced that you remain a religious fan of afterhours: you avoid confrontation, you insult, and you don’t even consider the theses of others who think differently, because the very fact that they have a different opinion leads you to deduce that they’re not people to debate with to enrich oneself, but enemies to be taken down with a barrage of childish insults. And it’s also for this reason that you remain a little fascist: yours is a religion, not a thought: thought engages with humility, religion dismisses anything that doesn’t adhere to the thesis as nonsense. And it’s easy to pass lux’s accusation off as a nonsensical and delirious attack, especially since it was quite vehement...