sadeyedpocahontas

every comment is superfluous

Wow, I was just trying to lighten the mood because it seems like you’re taking this issue too seriously. Doesn’t what you called "Freudian self-analysis" strike you as a bit self-ironic? This is a site where we share reviews, experiences, and opinions, and engage with one another: I hardly ever write reviews because I don’t think I’m very good at it; I just indulge occasionally and without any pretensions. If I told you that my reference was caz x, why should I lie? If you look at his review, it focused on topics like group dissolution and rebirth with a different or the same name, etc.... yours, on the other hand, was purely about musical content. Moreover, it seems to me that directly addressing the artist is a well-known tactic on these pages; you didn’t have exclusive rights to it. That said, I’ll take my leave and we’ll catch up in future reviews!

I agree on almost everything.

Maybe CAZ has been on this site a bit longer than you, and it's truly an "ineluctable" standard. But don't worry. You're on the right track too, and before long, you'll be ineluctably quoted everywhere.

I actually took inspiration from an old review by puntinicaz on the rage against the machine-audioslave-zack de la rocha issue... but could it be that something from PJ unconsciously stuck with me? If you want to give it a 1 in the review, go ahead; I myself said it's not the best.

so many memories....

Yes Thirdeye, this is certainly not the best review possible (after all, I rarely write reviews), it's just an excuse for the rant of an old fan... the album is very beautiful, in tune with the best things done by Alice in the 90s, and I invite the debaseriani to expand on the description of its contents.

But doesn’t Poletti comment on this great singer?

I don't want to sound blasphemous, but the intro of "one hundred years from now" reminds me of the first theme song from Candy Candy....such nice memories!

who knows if it really is like you say