So che? Banned

Let's lower the average for the album: 1.02 is too much!

I checked on Icedtears.com (http://www.icedtears.com/musica/metal_cd_hvis_lyset_tar_oss) it's scandalous!!! I hope at least Mirkopianta and Marcometallo are the same person, although I don't believe so. Even more serious is that he COPIED the review of an album that is already there and by an author that DeBaser is now full of. This worsens the situation, and I can only give 1. Outrage: I can already see this fake character like those belonging to “la gauche-caviar.”

He copied the previous review?!?!? I checked on Icedtears.com (http://www.icedtears.com/musica/metal_cd_hvis_lyset_tar_oss) and it’s outrageous!!! I hope that at least Mirkopianta and Marcometallo are the same person, even though I don't think so. I'm sorry, but at this point, doubts arise for me as well. This makes the situation worse; I can only give 1. Disgust.

I liked it enough, therefore an average rating once again, even though a couple of songs tempted me toward a four: and then to play like that after 20 years is, according to the writing defender, just a merit, compared to those who seek other commercially viable paths!!! (not that our guys need money, but there are those who are never satisfied and keep churning out heaps of crap).

Great album!!! Not a bad review, too bad it’s the fifth and adds absolutely nothing, that's why only 3: why not review something different??? And I’m not talking about Burzum, since there you’ve also written a duplicate (though surely enjoyable... and only a duplicate, not a fifth repetition).

Great album, the best of the down production, and I approve the review with full marks!!!

The best review of this consecrated summer!!! I don’t know them, but I’ll take care of it thanks to the good old soul searcher (nothing compared to an information mule)... and anyway, the age of the record, as ancient as it may be, does not undermine its quality: tempus regit actum.

Moreover, there’s the aggravating factor of the final P.S.: if you knew or said something new (maybe you could have started with a critique of a highly praised album) or you could have focused on something else. For Fidia: I’m not being ironic in the previous comment; you usually strive to be objective.

Great album, while regarding the review, it must be acknowledged that it's the best among those present, along with CliffBurton86's. It's only a shame that the initial part listing the tracks and the two words about the band are really useless! And all the references to the now-abused labels (prog jazz and similar to define the music, enough! At that point, you could use empty words like insciallà, dwert or similar crap!) For this, only three stars. As for the other comments, I agree that DeBaser is now full of reviews from partisans ("long live the Teatro dei Sogni"?!? Why not live the pussy then?) on the same album, but before giving a 1, I think one must make the tremendous effort to read it. Even though I understand the reactions of objective and serene commentators like Fidia in front of these repetitions. Until next time!!!

Terrible... and then dance!!!