easycure

But tell me, why do you keep having this discussion?! That shitty group I can't even bear to name, which is mentioned in the review, doesn't deserve so much attention. Alexis, I just want to add that when it comes to boring and monotonous stuff, you really know a lot if you listen to crap like that.. And your friend above, this DjZell, doesn't have the nerve to compare agonizing trash like the group discussed in the review with Nirvana!!! You see, your problem is this: you can't even understand the difference between two things so distant!! I understand that you still need to broaden your musical culture a bit, but there are countless "new generation" bands that are enormously better than those you mention and praise.. Just search a little, it's not difficult... with this, I conclude, and I'm sure as hell not going to waste any more of my time with such mediocrity..

I confirm; nice review, but you can't give five stars to a record like this!!!

Ok, well, I should have expected it.. Scaruffi rules!!!!!

Indeed, Scaruffi is quite fixated... However, his arguments are, although debatable, well documented, right? Anyway, let's stop here on Scaruffi!! I wouldn’t want this review to turn into some sort of forum about the "poet"!! Mea culpa for bringing him up...

DjZell!! Here too!! So you really exist!! O.M.G!!!!!!! ...Anyway, 4 stars for this stuff?! And how many for Stg. Pepper's Lonely Hearts Club Band then? Ten thousand?

I'm reviving my astonishment!!! Alexis, do you really exist? No, please! You're just Rivo, or Giov, or maybe Josi pretending to be fifteen!! Again: HOW SADNESSSSSSSSSSSS!

But what????!!!! I really hope that the whole dialogue with this Alexis and this djZell was made up... that they are actually two reviewers just having fun spouting nonsense... because otherwise... HOW SADDDDDDDDDDD!

Thank you, but I have no desire to read the responses that Scaruffi sent you. I too had an email exchange with him, and I can confirm, in fact, his tendency to "not respond." Consequently, of course, you must have already read his analysis on the Beatles, even better...

Perhaps you didn’t understand. I didn’t get "stubborn" because you "spoke poorly" of me, but I didn’t quite accept the arrogance with which you commented, and the presumption (a word mentioned more than once) that oozed from those very comments; it’s no coincidence that before my last three comments, specifically focused on the presumption in some of your observations, I merely limited myself to responding to the criticisms you raised against me; I ask you to go back and reread my response I’m referring to, because evidently you haven’t given it the proper attention.

Yes, but now that I've tried it, honestly, it kind of sucked.