geenoo Banned

DeRank : 3,10
DeAge™ : 7508 days • Here since 19 november 2005
Co' Sang Vita bona
Voto:
Fiquata: "keep them to yourselves because there are many things we would have liked to keep to ourselves, here, but we weren't allowed" :-(( ................ (I wanted to simulate crying, I don't know if the right emoji came out, I'm waiting for advice).
Jürgen Habermas e Joseph Ratzinger Ragione e fede in dialogo
Voto:
Erzacchiu, it's clear that your intent is to write like a three-year-old... but a three-year-old doesn't know how to write like you do... therefore reading an adult writing as if they were speaking like a three-year-old on a music site is really a lot of fun. Why am I even telling you this?
Jürgen Habermas e Joseph Ratzinger Ragione e fede in dialogo
Voto:
This page feels like a showdown between civil lawyers vs criminal lawyers, with a few crass and drunken side characters cheering on (see Iside). But Delori... with that faux mystical-legal prose in your last message, I really liked you... I can almost smell the incense. When I read "travaglio intimo," I feel a wave of happiness inside me.
Jürgen Habermas e Joseph Ratzinger Ragione e fede in dialogo
Voto:
Now I'm getting angry: Bartle: "you questioned the authenticity of De Lorenzo" (which, by the way, only an idiot could believe). This crime, which you committed at 7:16 PM on 28.09.2009, you know, right... where is it written in the penal code?! I'm drafting a nice complaint-querela with serious consequences.
Jürgen Habermas e Joseph Ratzinger Ragione e fede in dialogo
Voto:
Bartle then tries with the requesting organ.
Jürgen Habermas e Joseph Ratzinger Ragione e fede in dialogo
Voto:
Damn it, the now legendary comm. 56... I’ve read it three times to understand it. For me, the Crime of fanciful storytelling can definitely be identified. Who reports the crime to the appropriate authorities? You think about it, Bartle, since you’re already connected to the organization mentioned in paragraph 3?
Pearl Jam Backspacer
Voto:
@Franci, calm down first of all. Don’t be such a snob... it’s just music. But there’s something wrong with your reasoning. First, you hate PJ, then they’re trendy, then you have all their records but you only like one or two. Then it’s grunge yes, grunge no... In short... what the hell are you talking about? I meant that you can’t shoot judgments, especially uselessly mocking ones, about a historical period of rock music. It’s not your fault if you arrived too late to enjoy grunge. @Fottermaier: you misunderstood. I bought the record out of nostalgia for the early '90s. I meant that the last CD I paid 19.00 for from PJ was Yield. After that, I listened to them on mp3 or little more. This time, something clicked again, pushing me to buy the original CD. And it’s not leaving my CD player. I completely agree on the power of their live performances and I reaffirm my very good judgment on this album, if listened to without the earplugs of avant-garde-indie-denoantri boys.
Pearl Jam Backspacer
Voto:
Franci, don't talk about things you don't know except from hearsay (badly).
Walter M. Germain Il Magico Potere della Vostra Mente
Voto:
After all those beautiful words about the seriousness of certain topics... I really didn't get your conclusion, maybe it's because I'm a lost cause. But, come on, why did you even write this review?
The Doors Strange Days
Voto:
I liked the review. The album is history.