hugoniot

@ sylvian1982: so it's also my fault...

I almost forgot Jackie Brown, which I found to be a good thing. Anyway, this movie has nothing surprising about it at all.

I almost forgot Jackie Brown, which I found to be a good thing. Anyway, this movie has nothing surprising about it at all.

But... I don't understand why I should have read what Tarantino said about his film...??? No, I don't know what he said, and honestly, I don't really care. I didn't want to watch this huge piece of crap but another movie, so I stumbled upon it by accident. But who gets mad... you know how much I care... I don't understand where the beauty of this film lies... explain it to me... I can't grasp what the hell is so good about this movie... I repeat that if another identical director had made it, it would have been a colossal flop. I don't care who does what, that's all, it could have even been Jesus + Christ, I would have found it just as disgusting. That said, I appreciate Tarantino from Pulp Fiction, from Reservoir Dogs, the 20 minutes of Four Rooms, and a little less from Kill Bill, even though I liked it.

In going against the grain, I don't find anything funny or transgressive about it; anyway, I would rewatch Kill Bill, but probably with a heavy joint. I don't know, maybe I would even enjoy this pseudo nonsense.. :D

But can you explain to me what's so great about this movie, considering I see 4 and 5 flying around??? The dialogues are crap, there's no originality, and the editing (in my personal opinion) is awful..what’s going on?? An aura of magic..but where..??? There's nothing genius about it, all those years of experience should count for something..right? Anyone with a bit of funding could have made this film, probably even better; I know I'm being harsh, but the multiplex ripped me off for 5 euros..I'm thinking of abandoning the multiplex for films that aren't mega blockbusters just to indulge myself..it's a torture.

but it's not a matter of seriousness... it's made terribly, it has a comedy that has little to nothing new or funny about it, in short, it's a film that could have easily been skipped, and why waste time, money, and effort like this???.... a simple answer could be MONEY, but since everyone already has enough of that, I would like to add a second answer... FAME, the limitless care for one's damn ego. that's all, and if I could, there’s no way I would go back to the cinema.

But let's realize that stuff like this has been around in cinema for 30/25 years, and now just because Tarantino did it (by the way, the decent films he made can be counted on one hand), it's become a film on par with A Clockwork Orange or who knows what else... come on!

But who do you think you're fooling?? In my opinion, he’s just fooling himself, and that's it. It's a film that has nothing beautiful about it: dull dialogues, pathetic direction, terrible editing, and don’t even get me started on the ideas. If this film passes for acceptable, we’re really in trouble. Then there's one thing I don't understand: personally, I couldn't care less about what Tarantino says. I mean, if Tarantino were to squeeze out 2 kilos of shit from his smoking anus, you would be ready to scream masterpiece... It's trash and it remains trash. Without repeating the reason why I gave it a 2, I certainly didn't understand this connection to the Milanese of Jerry Calà, who has participated in much better films than this one (just imagine what crap we’re facing). 5 stars.. come on!!! Let me guess.. you left the cinema happy. I, as soon as I exited, regretted the money literally flushed down the toilet!!

Watched it 20 minutes ago... what a crazy piece of trash, there’s absolutely nothing in this film... the only redeemable things are the nice girls in it and some parts of the soundtrack.