JimMorrison

Icon, what clichéd comments...

I even tried to start a serious discussion, but I later believed it was impossible on a page where you read Francis as a reviewer. On one side, we have the heated souls stirred by what are his pseudo-provocations (or "pebbles in the pond," as he likes to call them), and on the other, hundreds of empty spam posts from those who read 1 about the Doors without even knowing who they are, and wave their arms unnecessarily. I'll accept your argument at most halfway, maybe only for what you included in the first post. On the second, I feel mostly entitled to disagree. <<<Nonetheless, the spirit and intent that make Francis one of the few bastions of healthy discussion and dispute remain, where every musical particle is examined with fresh eyes, even what is now taken for granted.>>> And to do this, is there a need to pass off a personal opinion, which is, by the way, highly debatable, as objective truth? Here I don’t see "the desire to stir souls," but only disgust a priori and without due depth. <<<There should be more reviews that - anyway with valid and explained reasons - question the unshakeable great classics of the past or re-evaluate what has been sidelined as a failure, a doughnut without a hole.>>> And that’s precisely what’s wrong: the valid and explained reasons are missing. There are only half-measures, snarky remarks, and hip language that sounds cool. Obviously, what do we expect? Serious and calm interventions? Shall we try to write together a review of that awful album known as The Piper by analyzing the dark circles of the "fool" Syd or Mason's face full of cheese? Come on, let’s shake up the system with the Francis method...

<<<I even re-summarize the '98 VHS tapes, and I find the videos. That's My People. Muro Bianco. Crew. Bombole. Aerosol Art. Dogs, cops, escape.>>>

<<< Not everyone, remember, has the same degree of intelligence, creativity, imagination, to fully understand such reviews, and not everyone has the desire or the willingness to wager money without hope of return. Give these people a chance. >>> So if your theory is extendable, Dante should have had to have you read the Divine Comedy first and see if you understood it? >>>

Kosmogabri: damn, I haven't heard it yet! damn damn damn! >>> One of the most beautiful things I have ever read in my entire life, I am visibly excited and moved.

@Nick: Did you really read them all or did you just guess by reading the names of the participants in the Festival?

And who talked about extending culture? Here we were talking about extending a theory. If then the theory is synonymous with culture, that’s another story... ZaIo', you tell Antimo who offers the company, he said he wants $$$old!

Damn, but this way you reveal the arcane mysteries...

Is it serious?

The more I read comments, the more I'm convinced that there's very little to discuss about the Doors... Alright, shall we talk about teenage outbursts? I used to vent with Isabella, what about you?