JimMorrison

DeRank ™: 3,31

DeAge™ : 7552 days • Here since 10 october 2005

AA.VV. Arancia Meccanica

17 jul 06

Voto:

Yes, but once again you don't understand, I am the one who speaks and you, blinded by arrogance and mental closure, don't get it, just like in this case. It’s always you who, trying to jump ahead with a "second moment" (that is, the moment immediately after reading), almost never grasp the thread of the conversation...

AA.VV. Arancia Meccanica

17 jul 06

Voto:

Alright, you go all in and don’t read carefully? It’s one thing to express your disappointment about an editor's choices and another to have a back-and-forth with a user. Read carefully and then respond; otherwise, it all turns into a “I meant to say...,” “...maybe I didn’t explain myself...” and so on. Have you ever thought about writing this (specifically, exactly this) to Claudio?

AA.VV. Arancia Meccanica

17 jul 06

Voto:

Oh Fidia, if you saw the movie, you felt the soundtrack though... :D Anyway, in two lines you expressed what I meant in the 25 previous posts.

AA.VV. Arancia Meccanica

17 jul 06

Voto:

The biggest problem, Doctor, was your post that contained: <<<If you've never read this review, how can you write posts like this?>>> Come on, a little attention... You don’t have to jump in the deep end just because you always have to accuse a choice made by an editor... Whoever published this review deemed it right to do so, according to their own (personal) evaluation criteria, trying as much as possible to align with a predetermined standard (?) that was discussed and approved. Then, of course, everyone is different from one another and interprets something in varying degrees...

Ligabue Ligabue

17 jul 06

Voto:

I'm curious about the reasons for your 4- on the album (of course in regard to my review); your opinion is always interesting. It's also the same for the upcoming one on Money And Cigarettes, which I recommend you listen to again while keeping in mind the external factors and the historical period of Clapp back then... And then Cooder is a nice listen, right? @Poletti: according to your reasoning, Bella di Padella deserves 5 stars?

AA.VV. Arancia Meccanica

17 jul 06

Voto:

@Doctor: Are you pretending not to understand or can you really not? First you say, I don’t know based on which criteria of intuition and logic, that I was the editor of the review; of course I reply that you’re mistaken and that I never read the review before posting it (let’s say I posted right after reading it, so you get there?), then you change course saying that your "you" was generic and referred to the class of editors?

AA.VV. Arancia Meccanica

17 jul 06

Voto:

So, ocram, maybe the mechanism isn't clear: if you send a review of Giovannona Coscialunga, it's a full review of a movie, given that there's really no music to support it (except for murmurs, whistles, and little horns), but if you send the review of A Clockwork Orange discussing the soundtrack (how you want to do it is your choice), the review gets published, whether it's good or not, then it's up to the users to decide. Here, music is really talked about very little, okay, and you're right, I'm not defending the review, but the publication criteria. <<<A while ago, I sent a review of an event trying to find music where there explicitly wasn't any>>> Well, what do you expect then? You see, things are different?

Ligabue Ligabue

17 jul 06

Voto:

You intrigued me, and I looked at all the votes of Poletti: I think I might be mediocre too...

AA.VV. Arancia Meccanica

17 jul 06

Voto:

Waitwaitwait: <<<it seems to me that you've made a colossal blunder and are struggling to admit it despite everyone reminding you of it>>> Me? What the hell does that have to do with me, excuse me? Whoever edited the review certainly had their reasons for doing so, but the fact is I've never read Fritz's review, let alone this one before my post...