Mandrocker

I correct the last sentence: "For example, 'Purpendicular' diverges quite a bit into pop and I liked it a lot. Which means that you don't appreciate the attempt to change."

Well... as far as the Crue is concerned, I definitely prefer their earlier works (“Too Fast For Love,” “Shout At The Devil”) and also the classic “Dr. Feelgood.” “New Tattoo” is just a return to the old sound and old style. A pure Motley album, unlike the previous one. I agree with you that sometimes a band's success doesn’t allow them to experiment, but I just can’t get into “Slaves And Masters,” I don’t like Turner. I liked “Purpendicular,” which leans a lot towards pop, quite a bit. This means I don’t appreciate deviation or change.

Okay. Got it;-)

I would propose a ban on those who copy reviews. It makes absolutely no sense.

I consider "New Tattoo" a good album. It's definitely a return to the glorious times of "Girls, Girls, Girls" and "Dr. Feelgood," but I can say that I appreciated the previous self-titled album more, as it was a sign of change or at least exploration. But since the market wants the good old Sex, Drugs & Rock 'n' Roll, the album flopped. Don't get me wrong, it's not that I despise this work, but I appreciate the bold choice of "Mötley Crüe."

Vote

Damn... in one fell swoop you got me two reviews on the Motleys... well, I’ll see if I can whip something up in time;-) "Theatre Of Pain" is a good album, but I still prefer their debut (which I reviewed). I've listened heavily to both, and also "Shout At The Devil," and this work is missing that rawness that "Too Fast For Love" has.

Mmm... is your decision related to the nickname???:D
As for "Imaginos," I’ve also read favorable opinions that considered the album a great work.. On the first listen, it didn’t strike me quite like this "Heaven Forbid" did.

First of all: the comparison with the namesake of the Crue can only stand in the context of the change in genre and sounds (by the way, I actually like that album), here the shift is aimed at pop... And what do you want me to say if I don’t like it and you do... I can’t just write to you: "This album is beautiful"! You think that, I think differently... it’s always the same point, it’s right and normal that there are different viewpoints. I gave what I needed to give to "King Of Dreams," which I don’t mind at all, or I pointed out that "Fire At Basement" is practically inspired by and similar to Lazy. I also pointed out that the last two songs are valid. It’s absolutely not true that I wrote that all the tracks are terrible; I just demonstrated that to you. Anyway, if you believe it should be rewritten, do it yourself... you know that my comments will reflect my thoughts flowing in this review. I responded with a bit of resentment because I don’t like being insulted, and the connection between review and reviewer is short...

I had other reviews in mind before diving into Blue Oyster a bit. And probably "Mirrors" I don't think I'll discuss. I was more focused on one of the earlier albums, or on "Fire Of Unknown Origin," which I really liked. If you want to do it, you have my full consent since the Oyster didn't even exist here on DeBaser;-)