The Punisher

Of course I'll stop, sooner or later I'll stop, I won't last forever... just a few more stones from my shoe and then I'll vanish as I came.

Forgive me "sonic smith" but I, whether you believe it or not, don't know this I_LoVE MUsic, I don't know if it's a man or a woman, I don't know when it's real and when it's not, I don't know if it's serious or just playing around, in short... as long as it doesn't annoy me and gives me compliments (whether they're real or fake) why should I comment on it? Why should I denigrate it? Just for the sake of it? I leave these pathetic games to others who enjoy them much more than I do... actually, I'll tell you... WHOEVER IT IS, I even have a soft spot for them (just think of the big heart this Punisher has, huh?!). Bye

Yes, but there is no proof on CD... I already had a review censored because it was NOT STRICTLY RELATED TO A MUSICAL PRODUCT, and I wouldn't want to write in vain again... however... if the editors could turn a blind eye... :-))

Unfortunately, she doesn’t sing and has never recorded anything.

tessio82 would say "you’re too conventional, you write to win over preferences, you review safe albums based on their past success" and a bunch of other nonsense. I liked the album, the review a bit less. :-))

Two things tessio82:
1. The artists I criticize are living large off their shit and they're making a ton of money from it – I AM NOT.
2. If I had wanted success as you say, I wouldn't have written FOR FREE on a site, like there are many others, with a "chance to hit it big" of 0.01, meaning ZERO.
3. Having nothing to lose, explain to me why I "would lack honesty": honesty ABOUT WHAT? I criticize these characters because HONESTLY, I just don't like them, period! If by "honesty" you mean the fact that in my stories I kill from behind or without warning, then I can see your point... but explain yourself better.
4. Whether I am conventional or not is of no concern to me. I've never claimed to be an innovator or anything; that is a limiting belief that people like you have constructed in their little heads, but NEVER have I positioned myself as "the coolest reviewer"... that would be ridiculous.
5. Where is it written that "everyone applauds like little dogs"? Do you guys even read the posts? More than half are fierce critiques, so, in summary, I tell you: WATCH OUT. You are talking about a film that no one is screening. You are discussing things that, I suppose, only you see. I don’t seem to notice all this success and this mannerism. Are you exaggerating or am I just not realizing anything?

Of course I understood, it’s just that you probably don’t know that besides the "easy targets" that are supposed to guarantee "easy approvals" (which often land me criticism from there too, don’t worry), I’ve also reviewed albums from "big names" (like the latest from Madonna, the untouchable Bob Dylan, the legend Vasco Rossi, the much-praised Bjork, and between today and tomorrow, another big one is coming…). So: a hit for each side. If I really wanted to go smooth (as you say) I would only stick to safe bets: reviewing Masini, Malgioglio, Albano, Pupo and the like. Since I don’t want to treat it as a job and I really don’t care much about success (success for what, you can explain that to me later), I shoot randomly into the pile without worrying about stylistic uniformity or anything else.
Of course, the "easy" targets amuse me more, and the review, in general, is more playful and light-hearted, almost like a joke - as someone pointed out to me. With the big names, I’m more careful about what I say. Yet, every criticism is a source of growth and reflection for me (as Don Bosco used to tell the Pharisees). Bye.

Thank you UnCoglioneAiMarginiDellaSocieta' for further clarifying a position that I fully share. I don’t agree with the idea that my reviews are commercial and marketable: first of all, I embody, with my modest means and through a little character born almost by chance, the feelings probably of a tight-knit group of people who think like you/us and who would like to "materially" erase these singers from the face of the Earth (obviously, mine is lowbrow literature meant for laughter rather than tears, or rather than actually practicing it!!) without having to explain anything to anyone. Secondly, I don’t understand where the "commerciality" lies in violent and petty actions, on the edge of legality, like those my character undertakes. Commercial because I "give relevance" to the singers in question, feeding their notoriety? Commercial because I promote the album in question just by reviewing it? Can you explain that to me better? Tks.

demagogic and sycophantic will be your sister, I only forgive you if you work for a Major as I understand: bread is bread and I understand you. I’m on DeBaser and I occasionally check the posts having a flat connection and, listen listen, I can even manage to work! If you don’t like the things I write, avoid reading the next ones: you might hate me forever.

Hooray for freedom of the press! Hooray for freedom of opinion! Hooray for a sense of humor! Long live Italy and long live the Italians!!