Bartleboom

DeRank ™: 35,89
DeAge™ : 7617 days • Here since 9 august 2005
Love Contact
Luigi Pirandello Uno, Nessuno E Centomila
Luigi Pirandello Uno, Nessuno E Centomila
31 mar 09
Voto:
Same: Pirandello is one of the few positive memories of high school... This might not be my favorite, but I gladly give it a good grade.
Seth Gordon The King Of Kong: A Fistful of Quarters
Seth Gordon The King Of Kong: A Fistful of Quarters
31 mar 09
Voto:
I would have liked to leave a more substantial comment, but I'm in a rush... Really nice review!! Well done!
Zior Every Inch a Man
Zior Every Inch a Man
31 mar 09
Voto:
The attack of Entrance of the devil is pure satanic delight! This album is truly a dark gem, where you can find echoes of Sabbah, Zeppa, Steppenwolf... and then there's the folk of Time is a reason!! Truly a great album. I'm so glad I didn't review it!:)))
Dr. Z Three Parts to My Soul
Dr. Z Three Parts to My Soul
30 mar 09
Voto:
Zior very big!! Super, you would be the perfect person to write something about them... :)) Great job also to Lewis!
Paolo Marcellini e Carlo Sbordone Elementi di analisi matematica uno
Paolo Marcellini e Carlo Sbordone Elementi di analisi matematica uno
29 mar 09
Voto:
Paolo, as I already told you, I don’t like being taken for a fool. So, please give me the same respect I've shown you so far. Therefore, there are two cases: either you adhere to the thesis of the "Shit Hypertext," or to that of "Pure Fooling Around." In the first case, just visiting any of your pages shows that the "interesting debates" you mention almost always involved the same characters: users who only appeared in your reviews and shared your strange tendency to shamelessly mix "shit with chocolate." Now, I don't mean to say they were your fakes, for heaven's sake. I just ask you: what would remain of your pages if we removed the comments from various Lavalin, Muitosaudismo, and co.? What would happen to the debates, the interesting topics, Borges?! Seriously Paolo, don’t mess with me, remember we’ve talked about this in private... If, on the other hand, we agree on the "just fooling around" thesis, well then the problem concerns mainly all those who came to your reviews, complimenting you, giving you "5," and agreeing with your crazy theses (like that - delirious - one about the aura of mystery surrounding Raffaella Carrà... oh my...). Imagine what your disciples like romeo1985 would say, knowing that your review, let’s say, on "Rimini Rimini," is not the result of a genuine appreciation for the work, but just a boring afternoon and the desire to have a good laugh?! ...it would be cruel, wouldn’t you agree?! And all the talks about hypertext?! Don't you think that it’s a bit too hard to distinguish, depending on the case, between "Hypertext" and "Fooling Around"!?! Then a little bit of the blame those who called you a fake who only cared about making a fuss and drawing attention was justified, right?!? I’ll be frank: to me, you’ve always taken us all for fools. Everyone: both those who praised you and those who condemned you. But you did it with a certain "style," if nothing else because to come up with such nonsense, it takes quite a bit of imagination!:)) These various Romeo, Pluto, Giustronzi... are just caricatures, people who attached themselves to your tail and hope to be taken for a ride for a while. As they say: ...it's true that things were better when they were worse!:DD I’m off, Paoletto... have a good evening! And come back in the other version that we like more!;))
Paolo Marcellini e Carlo Sbordone Elementi di analisi matematica uno
Paolo Marcellini e Carlo Sbordone Elementi di analisi matematica uno
29 mar 09
Voto:
"What the hell kind of serious and/or relevant opinions do you expect from me?" None: you're too stupid to have serious and/or relevant opinions.
Paolo Marcellini e Carlo Sbordone Elementi di analisi matematica uno
Paolo Marcellini e Carlo Sbordone Elementi di analisi matematica uno
29 mar 09
Voto:
So, I have to conclude that you still haven't learned to count to 10?!? For the umpteenth time: shut up Giustronzo, no one asked you.
Paolo Marcellini e Carlo Sbordone Elementi di analisi matematica uno
Paolo Marcellini e Carlo Sbordone Elementi di analisi matematica uno
29 mar 09
Voto:
Just for the record: recently I "came across" a work that you reviewed under your "original" nickname, which at the time sparked a very heated, even harsh, but nevertheless interesting discussion. When the moment comes, I believe I will write to you to share my thoughts. If it hadn't been for your review, perhaps I would have never acquired it... Therefore, I thank you in advance for pointing it out to me/us. You see, this is the beauty of Debaser. Not some supposed "hypertext" bullshit...
Paolo Marcellini e Carlo Sbordone Elementi di analisi matematica uno
Paolo Marcellini e Carlo Sbordone Elementi di analisi matematica uno
29 mar 09
Voto:
How many reviews have you written under the nickname "Il Paolo," and how many discussions/meaningful exchanges have you generated with your writings?!? How many users do you think have sought out the works you reviewed or deepened their understanding of the artists you've discussed?! The pages you've sent, now at the end, always followed the same script: half were comments from users giving you "5" regardless, and half were comments from users giving you "1" regardless... No debate, no discussion, no exchange of opinions. Don't come to me talking about the hypertext of a Heater Parisi review, Paolo, because I remember the discussions that arose on your pages and I don't really appreciate being played for a fool. No judgment of intentions: as I've said, as far as I'm concerned, everyone is free to do/write what they want. But having a platform like one of the most visited sites on the web and wasting it to talk about a university text, as far as I'm concerned, is just sad. Period.
Paolo Marcellini e Carlo Sbordone Elementi di analisi matematica uno
Paolo Marcellini e Carlo Sbordone Elementi di analisi matematica uno
29 mar 09
Voto:
To tell the truth, Paoletto, you forgot a point: my comment n° 11. In which I say that this site is a beautiful place when it's used to exchange opinions, share views, meet people, and engage with them. In which I say that using this same site to review textbooks and instruction manuals or to try to attract the attention of others (or to exercise/show off one’s writing skills by praising crap, I add now) is sad. My argument, as usual, is very down-to-earth. I'm not talking about right or wrong, about what should or shouldn't be censored, about what can or can't be published. I'm talking about sadness. And certain reviews, certain users, certain behaviors, I just find them sad.
Similar users
Groups
Editor
zzo_guardi
Grunged
SantoNatal
Cartuns
Cactus
CasoUmano
Rewards
2006
2010
2015
november 2006
august 2007
february 2008
april 2008
may 2008
april 2010
september 2015
week 41 - 2006
week 45 - 2006
week 46 - 2006
week 33 - 2007
week 48 - 2007
week 51 - 2007
week 9 - 2008
week 16 - 2008
week 21 - 2008
week 30 - 2008
week 34 - 2008
week 38 - 2008
week 41 - 2008
week 48 - 2008
week 25 - 2009
week 37 - 2009
week 44 - 2009
week 16 - 2010
week 22 - 2010
week 45 - 2010
week 37 - 2015
week 3 - 2016
week 4 - 2016
week 5 - 2016
Gran Visir -la recensione
week 1 - 2010