Bartleboom

DeRank : 35,89
DeAge™ : 7613 days • Here since 9 august 2005
Helloween Unarmed - Best of 25th Anniversary
Voto:
No no! The ogre was inside keeping watch, in case any wrongdoer decided to attempt an unexpected raid... ;)
John Mayer Live @ Wembley Arena, London 26-27.05.10
Voto:
Beautiful: fun and heartfelt! :)
Helloween Unarmed - Best of 25th Anniversary
Voto:
That being said, as far as I'm concerned, in both cases we are talking about (ex)great bands (in their genre so vilified, of course!). It's a pity that they continued to make albums. If Helloween had disappeared into the void more or less after Kiske's departure (or, at most, after The Time Of The Oath), I might still have their poster in my room. If BG – or at least the usual Kursch – had moved to Middle-earth let's say after Nightfall, I'd probably still have the panties with the dragon printed on the front and the orc's cave on the back.
Helloween Unarmed - Best of 25th Anniversary
Voto:
@Jurix: let's put it this way: if you want to imitate Kursch's voice from BG, you need to smoke 15 cigarettes made from cornfield hair and immediately after scream "Rrrrrriiiiissssseeeeeee frrrroooommmmmm theeee innnneeerrr ffiiiiiiirrreeee." Then wait for the 367th guitar/bass/drums/bells/viola/violi n/cello/keyboard/synth/french horns/carnival trumpets break and the 67th effect of the Riders of Rohan charging/attack on the fortress by a horde of orcs/deafening roar of Uruk Hai (oh! oh! oh!) and, with a little kid voice in the park wanting to play on the big kids' rides, hum something like: "We are the children of the promise land, come take our hands to the sea of light." And repeat it all again for 7-8 minutes straight. If instead you want to imitate Helloween, just squeeze your balls in 7/8 while the bass, guitar, and drums grind away in 4/4. For ballads, you can also resort to 4/4.
Johnny Griffin The Congregation
Voto:
Really good review! "However, I won’t make a note of this": I know it sounds harsh, but I think it’s better if I study the masterpieces of the genre properly first...
Lions in the Street Lions In The Street
Voto:
Another good review! As for the proposal, I think I'll pass: let's just say that right now I'm looking for a sound that I don't think exists... :))
Christina Aguilera Bionic
Voto:
Awesome! With you, the site now has a true expert in pop-pump! So far, you’ve only reviewed people who have made more or less voluntary "scapezzolamento" their artistic trademark... great job! Keep it up! On behalf of the site’s erotic fringe, I’m telling you that you can become our messiah. In the meantime: rating the hotness variable from (Y)(Y)1/2 (in this new video that is really ugly) to (Y)(Y)(Y)(Y) (in the photoshoot with the donut + when she was dark-haired).
Metallica Master Of Puppets
Voto:
"That in your place, even though I haven't been there, I know how it feels since no special requirements are needed!":DD but what kind of reasoning is that?!? It's not a matter of "requirements." Even to shovel shit (a profession far nobler than that of an editor, by the way) you don't need any particular qualifications, but you can't know how you would "behave." The issue isn't "how does it feel to be an editor?!", the issue is "if you were an editor, would you always avoid making jokes about the reviews that get published?!". The answer, quite simply, is: "Well! Nobody can say it because you aren't one!" We're in the realm of "What if?", of "hypothetical futures." And, believe me, you already have enough problems with the present tense to venture into such temporal digressions. And don't come to me saying "I know myself: I would never shoot the Red Cross," because—let me reiterate—it’s enough to see how you usually behave in your Panic reviews to doubt even the fact that you have 5 toes on each foot. What you don't understand is that you shouldn't have even started the discussion about duplicates: you’ve been on this site for, I don't know how long (I think years...) and you come out with crap like: “boo boo boo... but why do editors publish duplicates? I wouldn't publish them!" Seriously, this thing is record-slow, like a broken clock, like a shower tile. Just like with the "Mi Odi": by now even the retrieved reviews know that I'm stuck in bed and you keep saying "If you come to Mi Odi, I'll do this," "Come on, at Mi Odi I'll do that." It's incredible... I really hope you took a correspondence course. And I even wasted time responding to you, and moreover without you kissing my ass! And what did I gain?! You've thrown everything out there: from bans for those who are on the editor's back, to me harassing users (yes, with 4 comments a week...), the bazooka on the Red Cross... You’re not missing the sea, you’re missing a frontal lobe.
Metallica Master Of Puppets
Voto:
Oh my God!:D Putting it this way makes me feel important! But what the hell do the requirements for becoming an editor have to do with it?! With every comment, you bring up a different issue. You wanted to know why we publish duplicates and I told you. You wanted to lecture me because I come here to mess around and I told you that you can kiss my ass. Now, what are we talking about?! Are you upset because you wanted to become an editor?! About the site's decline (because of me, by the way...)?! <<Which users do you think will return to the site after they get mocked in their first review? The idiots>> I think you're getting tangled up in a concept that's too complicated for you... I mean: usually, when someone gets mocked in their first review, it’s precisely because they’re an idiot. Whether they choose to stay, confirming that they're an idiot, is another story. In any case: come on, Nes, enough with the nonsense... I’ve been visiting very little, everyone knows that. If my presence has increased these days, it’s only because I’m stuck at home; usually, I’m a very good boy; I didn’t even mistreat the reviewer on this page, in fact I even gave him a 5! Just 10 days ago, while yours truly was... um... "indisposed," a new editor was appointed (can you believe it! without my say-so! unbelievable!:D). But most importantly: you should know that the mocking on this page was collective before you showed up to bug us with the same questions that have been going around for 5,000 years. And know that mocking on the site has always been there and it’s been much, much worse. I’ve said it before: to get an idea, take a look at the reviews of Starblazer on Rhapsoy, then come back here and thank your lucky stars that certain characters aren’t around anymore, otherwise you’d already be finished with an apple in your mouth and a spit in your ass. Come on, let's get back to me and my ass that’s worth kissing. What happened to your brilliant complaint/proposal about duplicates and editors behaving badly?
Metallica Master Of Puppets
Voto:
Damn, it sure takes a GPS to get you to understand a concept... By the way: what do you know about what I think of the Pope? Have you ever been an editor? Have you ever been the Pope? No, so what the hell are you talking about? I've been the Pope twice in two different catechism plays and, believe me, it's a walk in the park compared to being an editor. But then again, sorry, what happened to the whole discussion about duplicates and the chastity of editors? Enough, you don't care anymore?