Bartleboom

DeRank : 35,89
DeAge™ : 7613 days • Here since 9 august 2005
EyeHateGod Live @ Circolo Magnolia, 20/04/10 - Le cronache del paparazzo slagg
Voto:
Damn Fenni! Hi!!!! It's been ages since you were around here! Now, to balance the happiness of seeing you again and bring this page back to a minimum level of dullness, I'll have to replace my usual Kärntner intimate cleanser with some much more delicious lawn mower fuel. Sending you a hug! :)
Dan Berglund Dan Berglund's Tonbruket
Voto:
Sure, if you're looking for the drawer for the underwear... Here you go: link rotto
Dan Berglund Dan Berglund's Tonbruket
Voto:
Sure, if you look for it in the snack bag... Here you go: Blog non trovato
Dan Berglund Dan Berglund's Tonbruket
Voto:
Have you talked to your andrologist about it?
Dan Berglund Dan Berglund's Tonbruket
Voto:
I think that "I want it big" has misled me...
Dan Berglund Dan Berglund's Tonbruket
Voto:
You're not talking about my swollen panties and/or their contents, are you?
Charles Ebbets Lunch atop a skyscraper
Voto:
Geenoo, you’ve been on the staff for YEARS?!?
Charles Ebbets Lunch atop a skyscraper
Voto:
1) geenoo has not been on the staff for years; 2) geenoo does not have the relationship that you have (had?) with some staff members; 3) geenoo has never had to endure the criticisms/complaints/silly arguments that I/you/the others have had to put up with over the years; 4) geenoo doesn’t have breasts; For all these reasons - and for others that would take too long to list - I would have expected a different behavior/discussion from you than from him. And anyway, I am not at all ill-disposed towards geenoo (and I think he knows it. If not, let me know and I’ll send him a private message right away telling him I care about him). My comments on his reviews are proof of that. Lastly, I didn’t understand: you and geenoo can "discuss" complaining about certain things (which, I repeat, are the same ones the users have been complaining about FOR YEARS) and I can't intervene?! The only one who can intervene would be the publishing editor?! So do you want a "Debaser vs the unfortunate editor"?!
Charles Ebbets Lunch atop a skyscraper
Voto:
@Kosmo: I understand that recent events may have "turned you against" someone, but you could have spared us this comment. Since the dawn of time, "choices" have been a source of scorn and questions like "why this one and not the other?!" and you know the reason better than anyone else here, given that you've been a regular on the site for a longer time: it depends on the discretion/sensitivity of the editor. Period. You don't agree with some of the editors' choices?!? Well, welcome to the user base of Debaser! Or do you want us (or rather: them) to use only your yardstick for publication/selection?!? I think that would work for everyone; we (or rather: they) handle the editing, and you (and geenoo) decide if something can be published and where. But you’ll also have to bear all the complaints. Including ours. If you’re feeling nervous, try to direct your resentment towards those responsible and maybe leave in peace those who, DESPITE EVERYTHING, keep working hard and pulling their weight.
AA.VV. "Note di Merito" - Auditorium Parco della Musica (Roma) 25.06.2010
Voto:
I had promised myself to read it all, slowly, as soon as possible. Done. It was worth it. Beautiful story! :)