To me, these streaming platform documentaries seem like excellent entertainment products, while they leave much to be desired in terms of real investigation and historical reconstruction. This one is no exception: it has a nice pace and a good build-up of narrative tension (and indeed I binged it in one evening). However, the substance seems much inferior to the form.
Aside from the passage "in the late '90s we were all very excited thanks to American Pie and all very aggressive because of Fight Club," which is something you can say only to my mother without the certainty of being told to fuck off, the film talks throughout about capitalism, unscrupulous entrepreneurs only interested in profit, budget cuts, etc., etc. And the numbers, the documents, the minutes of the operational meetings, the correspondence? As mentioned in the review: so did they really not hire anyone for the garbage removal?
Okay, things didn't work out. But why? Because there were budget cuts. Fine, show me those. Show me the contracts for the port-a-potties and the royalties the vendors had to pay to the organization.
Another thing is the interviewed characters. Randomly, I remember:
- John Scher: who clearly doesn’t take much to paint as the villain solely interested in profit, willing to deny the obvious, especially because he looks awful and grimy, and if he ever had sex in his life, he probably asked for his change back with cashback.
- Michael Lang: who, inseparable from embarrassingly short shorts, seems to be the most blatant case of undiagnosed Asperger’s in human history.
- An MTV veejay who, by her own admission, hosted terrible shows when MTV had already given up on any decency, who seems much more interested in always reminding everyone that "it was really awful and I was there."
- A freelance journalist, who probably found himself for the first and perhaps only time in the right place at the right moment and who likely bought a house thanks to the footage from those three days and still gets an erection at the thought.
- Someone who, while Sodom is on fire, is dealing out garbage bags to Gomorrah. Enough said.
- A small crowd of assistants, collaborators, third and fourth line operational/organizational types who were 20 at the time and, would you look at that, were not remotely involved in any decisions (but I acknowledge they found themselves in the middle of the mess).
- A guy who was evidently chosen only because he looks like Beavis, and a girl who was 14 at the time of the concert, both of whom say that if they did another edition tomorrow morning, they’d rush to be there.
At times, they barely ask the Mayor of Rome what his name is and little more. Fred Durst (who has had several opportunities over the years to revisit the topic) or Anthony Kiedis (why do Fire as an encore?) aren't interviewed.
Lastly: the consequences? Are there civil or criminal proceedings against the organizers and/or the hooligans who devastated a former military base? Who cleaned the area? What happened to Scher's company and the rest of the crew? Did they make a ton of money or did they go into the red?
Honestly: I "enjoyed" watching it, but it's mainly because it’s effective in sparking and fueling a sort of "apocalyptic prurience," where you know that Carthage will inevitably be destroyed and you don’t want to miss the moment when the walls begin to fall. However, it's not a documentary as I understand it. It’s an Amarcord, a collage of perspectives and personal experiences that don’t help to understand the historical truth and don’t even make much of an effort to provide points for reflection.