turkish

Mr_Iko: the anonymous advisor thinks it’s me. But he’s wrong. Anyway, the advisor is LOR15. I don’t know who Tano is, but it’s not me.

You see, there’s a poor fool who thinks that those he calls "sFASCISTI" hide behind fake names, like Tano and Gaetano. He thinks so because hiding is what he has always done, and he wants to believe that others are like him. In this case, he’s completely wrong (and it’s not the only time: he also thinks AXEL is a fake), but he continues to believe he knows the truth. Now: either he’s pretending because he thinks it’s funny (you know what a laugh) or he’s really ill.

√ Rockol - la musica online è qui - Novità Musicali

If you copy and paste from other reviews, you should cite the source! This time, we’ll do it for you...

Do not use "<" and ">" in the text of the reviews, they mess up the HTML tags. At most use the entity codes: "&lt;" and "&gt;". Or, better yet, if you want the angled quotes use "&laquo;" and "&raquo;" (« »).
Then... why do you say it's their only album so far when you've already reviewed another one (13th Step)??? Did you copy?

And who would you be to say that, Snow White?

EatherSun, look, I personally prefer these reviews to those pseudo-erudite ones that bore me to death. Whether or not to buy an album isn't decided by how many songs are described... usually if the reviewer writes in a nice way and shows enthusiasm, I trust them; otherwise, they can write whatever the hell they want, but it won’t grab me.
In this specific case: I’m not particularly fond of Gaetano's writing style, but he is enthusiastic, conveys emotions, and does it in just a few lines. Well, if it weren’t for the fact that I’ve never been able to stand the Queen, I might even give the album a listen. And here trust comes into play: if Gaetano were to review a band I don't know, no matter how well he writes, I wouldn’t buy it because from what he has reviewed so far, I've understood that we have different tastes. But I was able to grasp that because his brief reviews are quick to read and don’t bore me.
In Bowie’s case, on the other hand: I adore the artist, but Iko’s review (good one), enthusiastic yet overly elaborate (like Livio says somewhere, it seems) and "heavy," blocked the impulse to read it all carefully as well as the urge to rush to the store to buy it... sooner or later I’ll get it, but not right away. Because all this emphasis, this "I-know-it-all" attitude actually annoys me. Same goes for the various Led Zeppelin reviews, which now, thanks to bibiane and luciano, are almost getting on my nerves.
This is how I feel; for you it might be different. On DE-Baser there's room for you and for me. And for everyone else. Otherwise, the rest of the web is just a click away. That’s all.

I wrote it because the very long excerpt above reminds me of the book "Q" by Luther Blisset (a collective identity that later became Wu Ming for the book "54"). I haven't checked yet, but I'm almost sure it's indeed Q. It's a beautiful book, by the way.

Seen live, in Bolzano, Festa dell'Unità 2003, July 31. Absolutely amazing. One of the most beautiful memories of this excellent summer.

I know that the definition of "exaggerated" is too subjective to be applied to the concept of freedom. What is exaggerated for bibiane is not exaggerated for me. So for me, bibiane is reaction.

"It's fine to defend freedom of expression, but damn, let’s not go overboard." A very dangerous statement, very reactionary, very idiotic.